So it looks like the next Total War will be Total War Troy to be officially announced imminently
Here's a rough timeline of the different games: please correct me if I'm wrong

Americas
1521 Medieval II Kingdoms
1783 Empire Warpath Campaign

China
220 Three Kingdoms
290 Eight Princes DLC

Europe
430BC Rome II Wrath of Sparta
336BC Rome - Alexander
272BC Rome II
270BC Rome
218BC Rome II Hannibal at the Gates
58BC Rome II Caesar in Gaul
32BC Rome II Imperatur Augustus
235 Rome II Empire divided
363 Rome - Barbarian Invasion
395 Attila
520 Attila The Last Roman
768 Attila Age of Charlemagne
1080 Medieval II
1086 Medieval
1174 Medieval - Kingdoms - Crusades
1250 Medieval - Kingdoms - Teutonic
1700 Empire
1796 Napoleon

England
793 Medieval - Viking Invasion
878 Thrones of Britannia
1258 Medieval II Kingdoms

Japan:
1180 Shogun II Rise of the Samurai
1250 Shogun Mongol Invasion
1450s Shogun
1550 Shogun II
1850 Fall of the Samurai

5 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Best Total War

View Results
A Total War Saga: FALL OF THE SAMURAI
Empire: Total War - The Warpath Campaign
Medieval II: Total War Kingdoms
Medieval: Total War - Collection
Rome: Total War - Collection
SHOGUN: Total War - Collection
Total War: ATTILA
Total War: ATTILA - Age of Charlemagne Campaign Pack
Total War: ATTILA - The Last Roman Campaign Pack
Total War: EMPIRE – Definitive Edition
Total War: MEDIEVAL II - Definitive Edition
Total War: NAPOLEON - Definitive Edition
Total War: ROME II - Caesar in Gaul Campaign Pack
Total War: ROME II - Emperor Edition
Total War: ROME II - Empire Divided Campaign Pack
Total War: ROME II - Hannibal at the Gates Campaign Pack
Total War: ROME II - Rise of the Republic Campaign Pack
Total War: ROME II - Wrath of Sparta Campaign Pack
Total War: SHOGUN 2
Total War: SHOGUN 2 - Rise of the Samurai Campaign

My favorite of the old games was the Viking Invasion expansion, and Napoleon of the newer games.
But the greatest Expansion of all time was Medieval II Kingdoms - which added 4 whole scenarios as big as the base game. Best value for money ever.

Edit: and the worst campaign, in my experience, is Alexander.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Rome: Total War and trying to conquer all Europe

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

... with every faction (incuding non-playable)

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

back when other factions could be activated by changing a single file, rather than paying for the DLC

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

intentional omission. The poll also skips Three Kingdoms and Saga, because it's limited to 20 options

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

To tell the truth I remember I played some Total War games when I was younger but never got too deep in them but right now I have Total War: WARHAMMER and I need Total War: WARHAMMER II and also Three Kingdoms and Saga :P So propably I would vote for Total War: WARHAMMER.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Seems silly to include unpopular TW games and even campaign packs but to pass on some of the most popular games.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I skipped Warhammer because I consider it a separate thing (no matter how awesome).
I wanted to include Britannica and Three Kingdoms, but was limited to 20 entries. Also, people always have an inherent bias against the newest entries - either favorably because it's new and shiny, or negatively because of the changes.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yups, TW:W is the best one for me.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The only one I've played to any extent is Medieval Total War Gold (a friend recommended it highly, and disliked Medieval 2. I trust his taste, as we like the same stuff, so i haven't tried M:TW2 yet)

Also, thanks for this timeline!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The first two games, the overland map feels much more like a boardgame (especially Risk). Starting with Rome, they changed the overland map to be more dynamic, and started developing more complex technology trees. From there on in, the tighter-focused campaigns (Rome, Napoleon, Shogun II, and some of the Rome II DLC) are much better, whereas the more sprawling campaigns (Empire, Rome II, Attila) are more of a mess.

Warhammer was a breath of fresh air, bringing in a lot of new mechanics and ideas, which were then introduced into Britannia and Three Kingdoms but I can't comment as I haven't played those yet

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you for this breakdown, I really appreciate it.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I never could get into the Total War series. After spending 5-10 minutes in one of those battles I forget what I was doing on the strategic level. I do better with games like Civilization or Paradox games where all the combat is abstract and simplified.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you could auto-win the battles. I do that in most Total War games.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"auto-win", LOL
I still remember one my playthrough, when auto-play resulted in defeat (repeatedly), and playing the same battle myself I got a heroic victory

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Always a pleasure to play a NTW campaign with LME mod. Can't say enough thank you to those modders who made the game (and the others) even better.
I also liked Empire but for me Napoleon is better. My last TW game was Shogun II, you know when the serie became more Total KIT War.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Total War's an interesting franchise for sure. I personally love Rome 1 for the campaign management and Shogun 2 or Rome 2 for the battles themselves. I definitely do think that the strategic complexity of the campaign map itself has been extremely dumbed down and become unbearably boring with anything after Medieval 2. With economy management becoming even more basic, no stack splits, no reinforcement, no populations, no culture, no historical effects like slavery vs. population and no population happiness management. It's now just a "click this for money or click this for alternate bonus" type of management.
Not saying Rome 1 was complex, but it was definitely more complex than what it is now.

Haven't played anything after Rome 2 though, so hopefully it's gotten better.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I prefer the campaign management part of the game, which is why I couldn't get into Empire or Shogun II, and why Rome II got boring after a while Rome II is definitely too big

On the other hand, Napoleon's almost disregard for campaign management forced/pulled me in to the battles, and I thoroughly enjoyed that game

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Caesar in Gaul - 58 BC, not AD

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

fixed, thanks

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Favourite is by far Warhammer (not played Warhammer 2 yet). The reason for that is simple, Total War has always had a really lackluster AI. The AI ended up being really predictable, and that made the games feel repetitive. Warhammer has much greater unit variety that things feel more varied, so the AI issue does not cause the game to feel as repetitive.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I wish we had another pew pew Total War like Napoleon or Empire.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Napoleon is my favorite

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Total Warhammer

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Warhammer AND Rome 2

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Empire-Rome II. Not the bests, but my favourites

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

IMO, Rome II's biggest problem was its size and scope. The smaller campaigns are tighter, and that makes them a much more enjoyable experience

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

With 50-60 provinces, for me the game becomes boring on the management aspect; on that point of view, Rise of Rome or Anibal at gates have more fun. But at the long term the big campaign have battles more interesting to me because the armies are more balanced.

In that aspect, Empire never gives me balanced battles in campaign (AI always comes with surreal combinations of artillery and elite troops), but I get fun thinking the action in three diferent theatres, without chances of get fast support on any there, is a nice challenge.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I loved Rome

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Loved Rome, and really enjoyed Attila. I know it wasn't popular but it was quite satisfying to finish the Western Roman Empire campaign :D

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Definitely enjoyed medieval 2 the most. Probably also played it the most but i wouldnt know, seeing as i had it on physical disc rather than steam.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

it also had the greatest expansion pack in history. Kingdoms added 4 campaigns that, though not quite as good, were as big in scope

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Kingdoms also had an amazing soundtrack, good times!

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.