No. Maybe if you used the magical search bar, you'd see this is the fourth time this minute someone opened this thread and that the opinion of the majority of users and the staff is that, until someone actually comes up with a system that isn't entirely stupid, 300P is good. The problems you raise are not as big an issue as people keep thinking they are. If you're not happy with the level of discussion in this thread, maybe you should have closed it before the flames got too hot for you. I'm closing it now.
Comment has been collapsed.
154 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by Wok
281 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by Wok
8 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by TheLimeyDragon
1,247 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by WaxWorm
82 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by GarlicToast
71 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by LighteningOne
145 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by seaman
91 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by idontknow23
168 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by herbesdeprovence
16,945 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Riszu
17 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by Vampus
9,492 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by Mileworg
775 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by lindax
40 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by Alesia
There, I said it. I know a lot of you don't agree.
I think people have too many points, and are entering giveaways of games which they are not even interested in. Thus, this results in a lot of redundant entries everywhere, reducing the winning chance of those few who only enter games that they really want to play.
This is especially true ever since contributor value was introduced, increasing the number of giveaways on the site as well as point regeneration.
I don't know, I just think people want to win for the sake of winning now. Not forgetting those who even regift/trade their wins.
Honestly 180-200P is just about enough if you ask me.
Edit: Haha, so much for a civil discussion eh? Yall have a good day too.
Comment has been collapsed.