No. Maybe if you used the magical search bar, you'd see this is the fourth time this minute someone opened this thread and that the opinion of the majority of users and the staff is that, until someone actually comes up with a system that isn't entirely stupid, 300P is good. The problems you raise are not as big an issue as people keep thinking they are. If you're not happy with the level of discussion in this thread, maybe you should have closed it before the flames got too hot for you. I'm closing it now.
Comment has been collapsed.
286 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by Wok
159 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by KevinWin789
396 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Wok
1,248 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by logorkill
39 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Foxhack
8 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by TheLimeyDragon
82 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by GarlicToast
22 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by ashtwo
83 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by root777
5 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by hbguru
219 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by ChestnutS
650 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by RePlayBe
32 Comments - Last post 37 minutes ago by Darshao
4 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by t3aztv
There, I said it. I know a lot of you don't agree.
I think people have too many points, and are entering giveaways of games which they are not even interested in. Thus, this results in a lot of redundant entries everywhere, reducing the winning chance of those few who only enter games that they really want to play.
This is especially true ever since contributor value was introduced, increasing the number of giveaways on the site as well as point regeneration.
I don't know, I just think people want to win for the sake of winning now. Not forgetting those who even regift/trade their wins.
Honestly 180-200P is just about enough if you ask me.
Edit: Haha, so much for a civil discussion eh? Yall have a good day too.
Comment has been collapsed.