300 P is too many points.

Most games I really want is worth 40-60 points, so for me, I don't want lower points as I'd only be able to enter about 4 giveaways a day (with 2000+ entries each). But during bundles, the regeneration of points could absolutely be slower.

First world problems.

ok

300p is not that much. They are 2 fake 2K Collection giveaways only. :-)

Currently the system is fine.
Actually, you won 16 times and you gave away 10. That needs fixing don't you think?
In other words, if everyone had kept a balance on wins/giveaways it could have been much better from decreasing the point cap or changing the system in general.

At the moment I rarely use up 100 points even though I check all active giveaways. This is because of 2 factors. There is a small percentage of Steam games that is being given away, mostly the same titles over and over. From these I have won a lot that I want. I only go for games I want and mostly that cannot be purchased in retail. But before, I was able to use 300 twice a day. OK, the variety of gifts was greater some months ago.
In all I doubt any point changing will solve anything, unless if its a big change. What could help your issue a bit is limiting entries after you have won a giveaway. For example, you win a game, and then can't enter any giveaways for (5-7 days). But any giveaways you have entered prior to winning should still count for you, so you could technically still win in the cool-off period.

Honestly XXXP-YYYP is just about enough if you ask me.

Just limit entries to 5 games a day and get rid of points altogether.

Dont like something LEAVE the site.Create your own and make your own rules.

Or let just ban bundle-games. That will stop massive point generation that happens from time to time.

5 entries per day. That way people will only enter giveaways for games they REALLY want, not just for the green banner.

Its not about the top points you can have. 300 or 200 or 100 is the same thing. Its maybe wiser even to INCREASE current top. The problem is the RATE points increase. SG with same rate but 100 points will just mean that you have to login 10 times/day so you have time to spend all your points.

For some people 300p isn't enough..for me it is, because I only enter some few I'd really like to play, though I mostly enter group giveaways, so the chance to win those I enter is much higher, but I think 300 is a good number of ponints ;)

Oh look, it's this thread again.

What about giveaways with 150 entering fee?? like this one http://www.steamgifts.com/giveaway/zowCY/2k-collection. proberly they are as fake as justin biebers music but you get the point

... and i hate value $30.00 in my Profil ... two games are not from bundle :)

I like the 5-10 entries per day idea

How about users start with a 50 point cap and unlock up to 300 through a little contribution?

It doesn't matter how many points you have...I have 300 and I won only 2 times and only beta shit so...theres nothing to cry about

that wasn't a question quasarballz. I don't think its a bad idea.

P.S. - That TuRRi21 makes me so mad. URRR. why you trolling on everyone. URRRR. so mad I am. :P

I absolutely agree with you.

Lowering points doesn't solve any of the problems mentioned.
"Not forgetting those who even regift/trade their wins." this is completely irrelevant to the discussion

Why does it matter if points are lowered? These are free games that everyone has a chance to win I doubt people would leave because there are a few less points than they used to have. I think it would help people enter more giveaways that they want and not just enter for the sake of entering.