The only correct way to play a game series is to start from the beginning, unless there is a reboot.
Comment has been collapsed.
Not necessary, but enhances the story world, and the characters. First game essentially introduces the main character and his friends to you, and intros the world and it's races and their states/interactions.
But as far as pure story goes, witcher 2 starts a new one rather than being a direct continuation of the second.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think W1 was superior to W2 in everything, including combat (my personal preference tho). W2 focuses on constant action, I didn't need to use a single potion thorough the game, signs were also pretty much optional. All you need to do is to draw your sword and keep mashing mouse buttons in the right order. While you simply need to use potions in W1 to actually progress in the game, signs are almost necessity and I find combat more challenging.
I'm not even talking about the story... while the main story line in W2 was quite good, the side quests were plain stupid and boring. I'm not saying that all W1 quests are brilliant, but most of them... are fun... and rewarding. There were certain... ehm, cards, that you could get for completing certain.. "quests"... delicate quests.
BTW I played W1 way before W2. Maybe that's why I don't like W2, those two games are really different and I expected something else from W2. Also, W1 was one of very small amount of games, that were dubbed in my native language.
Oh yeah, and I finished W1 2-3 times and started even more "new games" (I really like the early part of the game). While I finished W2 only once.
Well, I can't say that W2 is a bad game. But personally, I don't like it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Agreed. W1 was much more enjoyable once you adapt the combat system. In W2 it got more chaotic and consolelike. Another huge difference - potions. In W1 I really needed to drink them in some situaions, in W2 however the only ones needed were "cats" too see stuff in the darkness, other than that, no use for them. Story was fine in both games, the lenght of games satisfactory if you take time to do some sidequests.
But the thing that was the most annoying was W2 client stability. It kept crashing every once in a while during game saves. Had to do some tricks with memory, deleting older saves, changing the subtitles to different language (my personal favourite) to get the game to work properly.
All in all, in my opinion W1 > W2
Comment has been collapsed.
14 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by LittleBibo1
1,830 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Axelflox
9 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Chris76de
87 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Glas
386 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by adam1224
31 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by OneManArmyStar
207 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by sensualshakti
206 Comments - Last post 23 seconds ago by samwise84
1,603 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Masafor
8 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by NewbieSA
0 Comments - Created 1 hour ago by VahidSlayerOfAll
732 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Arvennios
77 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by tarikgoethe
9,544 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by EveryShadeOfLife
Hello,
wanted to ask, if it is necessary (by necessary i mean, to understand the story) to play Witcher 1 before 2 ?
Comment has been collapsed.