Deleted my post because sudden half retardness. But I still think it's not the right place to throw this kind of thread.
Comment has been collapsed.
You are right, boss. •Please avoid creating topics for political discussion.
Comment has been collapsed.
When support members come back from whatever they're doing, they'll be like "Come on, you can't let the kids alone for five minutes ! Five damn minutes without surveillance and they start a war."
Comment has been collapsed.
I didn't think the thread was that bad tbh, pretty reasonable by comparison to other places.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
6 million dead jews, gipsies and other minorities cant be compared to this
Comment has been collapsed.
Tired of all this. Lordran awaits me.
puts elite knight armor on
Comment has been collapsed.
The Achzarit is just piece of garbage, Namer is the real deal. Also Merkava Mark 4 is shitty too, the improvised mark 3 is better generally.
Comment has been collapsed.
The problem isn't who developed the weapons, but who use them.
Comment has been collapsed.
why always with the Hitler?
some variety would be nice.
nobody cares about africa or asian genocides. you even overlook others in europe.
what about the guys responsible for darfur or Rwandan(which the un basically condoned if not helped) or that polpot guy, or nguema or Mao's 63mil, or salin's purge both in recent history vs hitler's paltry 6million. what about that ancient Chinese emperor guy who's name escapes me that killed....pretty much everybody? who cares about the Amalekites and the Midianites? ect ect
(personally my favorite was the one the un helped by pulling out any troops in or near the area and basically taking away the victim's guns so the genocide would go more smoothly followed in #2 by cambodia which the media ignored/covered up because of vietnam)
but no, always hitler.
Compare somebody to Enver Pasha next time or something.
Comment has been collapsed.
I haven't read such a huge amount of bullshit in a while. And that goes to you, OP.
Comment has been collapsed.
After reading the whole thread a bit of myself is dying on the inside.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm in no high horse, but if you want to believe a conglomerate of bullshit, chauvinism, lies and mindless propaganda go ahead.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's a gaming site. I guess that most people here are in their teens and / or have a very basic education and views when it comes to politics, history, and critical thinking skills.
Conspiracy nuts, tabloids and wrong information receive a lot of attention and are easily lapped up, and edible sites like Wikipedia turn everyone into an instant "expert" with an opinion.
Comment has been collapsed.
Welcome to the Middle East, where nobody has a fucking clue whats going on!
Comment has been collapsed.
cruelty does not have levels of comparison, hitler is the same of those who kill one person imho
Comment has been collapsed.
I generally feel we should try to settle things peacefully and that bombarding a country doesn't really solve anything or send any message besides, hey we are stronger then you and we can do this whenever we want. Also i feel this is relevant. I won't argue or fight with anybody that doesn't agree or thinks otherwise, just wanted to give my two cents to this topic
Comment has been collapsed.
Someone remember Crusades? ( little link just in case someone doesn't know what I'm talking about : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades ) They hated us for that. We didn't learn a single thing from it.
They will probably gonna bomb Syria. Will something good happen from that? NO! More people will die. You will say ok even now people die there. Yes but that's not all. When they will bomb Syria when someone will die the extremist organisations will use that (doesn't even matter who killed them) and made the relatives hate us even more. So it will be easier to find people ready to suicide just to kill us. (In a war is imposible not to make civilian victims. One single civilian victim is enough for extremists to get more adepts. Don't get me wrong even if you do perfect bombing and don't kill civilians the terrorist organisations will kill some people and then tell that those people were killed during the bombing. That's how far they will go.)
I have a simple rule if they like to kill each other let them kill each other. If you go and try to stop them at least one side will decided that it's better to kill you also so there will be casualties on your side (one way or another there will be, even if u bomb them you can't stop some suicidal syrians to kill some europeans/americans). Even if u are neutral one side will thing you are against them.
If you were a syrian and a bomb from an us/french airplain hits your house by mistake destroy it kill your entire family destroy everything you have what you will want? Revenge! Because that's human nature. And when an terrorist organisation will offer you everything you need to take your revenge (free trip to us/french and a bomb) you will take it because you anger will make your blind.
They say learn history not to make the past mistakes. Well I think in the last 20 years we have tones of examples that we learned nothing from history cause we are doing the same mistakes over and over and over. Sorry to say this but for this planet it's better if all humans die, else humans will destroy it with their stupid wars. I doubt that humans facing extinction will improve, I believe they will just blame each other and kill each other for ending up in such a situation (humans refuse to admit their mistakes).
L.E.: Humans have other better things to do like:
Comment has been collapsed.
You forgot stopping the wasting of finite resources.
Comment has been collapsed.
I have friends whose families are in Syria. Whatever you think you know from the lying media, it's much, much worse than that. And no, the "opposition" has nothing to do with the atrocities being committed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Of course, they're only committing enormities and iniquities.
Comment has been collapsed.
The US a long time ago made a strong statement against people who use chemical weapons. If the US backs away from that stance the US will be showing that they are weak and it will also tell other nations they might get away with doing even more things than just using chemical weapons.
You guys really should look up the effects various chemical weapons have. They are not a fun thing to deal with. Now I am not saying Syria is the one that used it. However someone did. Right now according to some people high up in the US,as well as the French government. ( The French government is the one claiming to have proof )
Also to note that Syria has a fairly large arsenal of chemical weapons, something they have been building on supposedly as a countermeasure to Israel’s alleged nuclear program.
Comment has been collapsed.
Israel is not allowed to create or hold possesion of nuclear weapons. Should we invade it too?
Comment has been collapsed.
There is a difference though, as the US never made as strong a stance against Nuclear weapons as Chemical weapons. That and sadly once again we are not 100% sure if Israel actually possess Nuclear weapons. I would not be shocked if they do though.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
I said not AS strong of a stance against. I am not saying that the US does not have a strong stance against it. Also to note, in the link you mentioned ( BTW you should never 100% trust wikis. )
"Three states—India, Israel, and Pakistan—have never signed the treaty. India and Pakistan are confirmed nuclear powers, and Israel has a long-standing policy of deliberate ambiguity ( see List of countries with nuclear weapons ). India argues that the NPT creates a club of "nuclear haves" and a larger group of "nuclear have-nots" by restricting the legal possession of nuclear weapons to those states that tested them before 1967, but the treaty never explains on what ethical grounds such a distinction is valid."
In the link to the list
"Israel is also widely believed to have nuclear weapons, though it has refused to confirm or deny this, and is not known definitively to have conducted a nuclear test"
Comment has been collapsed.
I know I should not trust wikis. But I still think that ratifying a treaty against their proliferation is positioning yourself heavily against it. Also nothing more that vage suspicions were enough for granting a military invasion (Or a Humanitarian/Pacifying force, whatever you feel like calling it) being deployed to Iraq.
Comment has been collapsed.
Don't forget to note that Syrian government has been forgoing using their "fairly large arsenal of chemical weapons" for the entire duration of the conflict. They even went into the offensive and pushed rebels from several cities. And then suddenly, when certain countries are looking for any excuse to invade, they use chemical weapon. On civilians.
Comment has been collapsed.
A section of it, I encourage everyone to read the whole thing of course.
"The Syrian regime acknowledged for the first time on July 23, 2012, that it had chemical weapons and threatened to use them in case of Western military intervention, but never against the Syrian population.
The government and the armed opposition accuse each other of having used chemical weapons in the 28-month conflict.
Syria is one of the few countries not to have signed the Chemical Weapons Convention and is believed to have a large stockpile of sarin and other nerve gases.
The Syrian program was launched in the 1970s with the help of Egypt and the Soviet Union.
In the 1990s, Russia provided support, followed by Iran since 2005, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative, an independent organization that tracks data on weapons of mass destruction."
Comment has been collapsed.
Your point being? I never said that they don't have the weapon, I also haven't accused either side of using it. All I said that it looks suspiciously coincidental, and that for Syrian government using chemical weapon right now when the entire world is watching would be incredibly stupid.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yep, the US did make a strong statement about chemical weapons a while ago... And we should have kept our mouths shut instead. It doesn't matter what they are doing in Syria, the US has no business trying to police the world and we can't afford another frivolous war.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yep, the US did make a strong statement about chemical weapons a while ago... And we should have kept our mouths shut instead. It doesn't matter what they are doing in Syria, the US has no business trying to police the world and we can't afford another frivolous war.
Comment has been collapsed.
1,816 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by rongey420
23 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Provos
16,302 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by GeoSol
47,108 Comments - Last post 56 minutes ago by BlazeHaze
8 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by kudomonster
43 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by BorschtLover
58 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by SketCZ
868 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Melusca
9,539 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Noxco
74 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Ellendyl
99 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by NoYeti
1,599 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by quijote3000
153 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Exodust
57 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Fluffster
it's sad , i think it's even worse than Adolf Hitler
to kill your nation that includes kids , moms , fathers , and baby's
i'm from Israel , there is few hurt people's that coming from Syria for medic.
Syria and Iran are together , if USA will attack next week Syria , Iran + Syria will attack israel , 50-50.
till now , +100,000 people's already died.
why nobody do something ?
even the United Nations left syria , everybody afraid T_T
wish i could go there and fight for those dead children s that only wanted to live they're life's.
Israel has the most powerful weapons , most of them secret from what they told
Jericho
if there is Jericho III , there is already Jericho V
Nuclear weapon
we have more than 200 nuclear rockets from rumors
The Arrow
This rocket can destroy ballistic bombs without anybody will get hurt
Iron Dome
David's Sling
Merkava
Uzi
Tavor
Achzarit
Spike
Kfir
Galil
Comment has been collapsed.