When Bethesda touted Starfield would have a thousand procedurally generated planets I immediately thought about No Man's Sky when it first released and KNEW they were gonna be boring, lifeless worlds. At least NMS tried to generate unique wildlife even though the animals looked janky as hell and very stupid at times. There's just no way a company as lazy, incompetent, and stuck in the past as Bethesda could have procedural generation that would be convincingly complex and varied.
Comment has been collapsed.
Correction. They are saying "Game is great. You are boring, it just works. Now pay up for work we did not do".
Comment has been collapsed.
41 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by BSkorpion
45 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by elysium1988
291 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by JX8
250 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by McZero
795 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by FranckCastle
364 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Zepy
44 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by IronKnightAquila
536 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by osteburger
111 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by lav29
134 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by lav29
638 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by lav29
160 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by lav29
78 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by blueflame32
803 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by Xiangming
https://www.vg247.com/starfield-bethesda-responding-to-negative-steam-reviews
Bethesda Customer Service responding to negative reviews: "Game is great, you're boring, it just works."
Comment has been collapsed.