I'm not sure how I feel about this yet. This might be the only way we'll get rid of the scumbag that is Bobby Kotick, but it appears he is remaining on board for now.
Let's just hope Microsoft doesn't go back to Xbox (timed) exclusives in 5 years, or PC will be a lot of games poorer. I think in general this much consolidation is a bad idea.
Comment has been collapsed.
maybe that was one of the conditions to being able to purchase to company is keeping him on the team and i doubt they will go back to timed exclusives they have seen and felt the power of pc gaming in terms of making money
Comment has been collapsed.
This might be the only way we'll get rid of the scumbag that is Bobby Kotick, but it appears he is remaining on board for now.
Ah yes, let's rejoice in a scumbag being replaced by even worse scumbags...
Comment has been collapsed.
I honestly was wondering how the "corporate culture" at Activision hadn't make more waves until now. Guess Micro$oft profiting from it explains why.
I would say it's a win/win if corporate greed cleans up the sewage of Activision and gives people a more decent workplace but then they are keeping Kotik so meh just another $$$ grab.
Comment has been collapsed.
For now, however, Kotick remains in his position with the public support of Activision Blizzard's board of directors, which in November 2021 expressed confidence in his "leadership, commitment and ability to achieve [the company's] goals.” and "that Bobby Kotick appropriately addressed workplace issues brought to his attention"
Translation: sorry but this dude is making us a shitload of money despite everything that's happening around him so he's still good in our books
I wish I'm wrong but it is likely that he stays. And even if they boot him out it still won't make a difference
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah used to be that the market took care of a-holes like that but not anymore.
And the golden parachutes are blocking the sun these days... while they land on their feet in yet another board or top job in another company. Used to be these guys were paid the big bucks because they were taking all the risks. Not anymore.
But hey at least employees can sue Micro$oft next time. Of course since Micro$oft got what they needed from the previous lawsuit, chances are this one won't even see the light of day.
Comment has been collapsed.
I find it hard to follow your reasoning. Buying at an optimal price point stinks of monopoly? Besides, they seem to have paid more than one would have guessed from the estimated value of the company which is odd but may be some sort of consolation.
Comment has been collapsed.
Ha. Maybe Activision's games will come to Steam now.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's what I'm hoping too. Particularly the Tony Hawk remaster.
Comment has been collapsed.
that is my first thought like Call of duty might come back
Comment has been collapsed.
I hope so. Now that Microsoft owns both Bethesda (owners of the Wolfenstein IP) AND Activision (Developers of the 2009 game), Wolfenstein 2009 might even come back to Steam. (RIP to those collectors who bought it for hundreds of dollars, though.)
And maybe even Blizzard games? Although that'd be a massive shock if they do. But Imagine WoW, Overwatch and Diablo on Steam. Even if people had to double dip, I bet it'd bring in a lot of cash and boost the userbase all around.
Comment has been collapsed.
With all the acquisitions from M$ in the gaming industry recently, I think it's more likely that this will result in less games on Steam.
Once they have built themselves a little monopoly, they'll pull everything from Steam and you'll have to get Game Pass to play anything that's not indie.
Comment has been collapsed.
first result on slick deals?
(basically: sign up Xbox Live Gold, charge up 3 years, upgrade to Ultimate for 1 month, this will upgrade also the 3 years from Live Gold to Ultimate)
Comment has been collapsed.
Monopoly you say? Same as Nintendo & Playstation (But Thanks to Jim Ryan, many games are coming to PC and it looks like Ghost of Tsushima is Next)
Comment has been collapsed.
“When the transaction closes, Microsoft will become the world’s third-largest gaming company by revenue, behind Tencent and Sony”
Comment has been collapsed.
Why what? That none of the games appeal to me, or that I'm not sure I'd be happy with the purchase?
If it's the latter, then it's because bigger, bloated, monopolistic, predatory companies that chew up and spit out smaller companies is often the result. Not close enough to know if that's the case here, and I certainly hope this will end the misery that staff at Activision had to endure - but Activision were already too big in my opinion.
Comment has been collapsed.
well Activision was in a pretty bad state so maybe this saves a lot of jobs and brings a ton of games like maybe pro skater and crash 4 to Steam
Comment has been collapsed.
Totally agree that something had to change at Activision - and cool for those that this brings their games closer to. But not forgetting that when mergers like this happen, it's rare when many duplicated jobs and departments aren't scrapped - so if anything, could mean less jobs. I'm totally speculating, and although I'm not exactly a MS fan, it's true that you don't hear as many stories about mistreatment of staff there. But think I would rather have seen a corporate shakeup at Activision, and Bobbies ass fired - but we'll see how this shapes out.
I'm also not a fan of game passes (or whatever they're called these days) so would not like to see exclusives on those kind of platforms.
Comment has been collapsed.
i have never used game pass but why do you dislike it? sound like people will get more for their money - anyway my hop is that they are still separate companies or parts of the overall Microsoft brand and Microsoft just oversee it all and no i doubt with such a large amount of games (49 so i saw plus a few under other names) on Steam already i very much doubt the would be exclusive to game pass well maybe at first they might but not long term - Microsoft know the value of Pc gaming like Sega has and Sony are even starting to get into - so maybe this will bring more and more to pc and Steam (and elsewhere like Epic and GOG of course)
Comment has been collapsed.
The whole game pass thing just holds no appeal to me - I'd rather just have my own library and not be forced to spend money monthly, but only when and if I see a title that I like - and would still have access to in say 20 years, without having paid 20 years of monthly subs. (Yeah, I know the whole argument about not "really owning" the titles, but I don't envisage a time when Steam would disappear overnight).
For sure it's good for some players - just not me. I hope you're right about exclusives - that they will be rare, but MS does have a tendency towards that end - and with a bigger selection they could use this to encourage more monthly subscribers with exclusives.
Looking over reddit, twitter and other forums, seems the news had been met with mixed reactions, and it is too soon to know how this could play out - but to go back to my original point - am just glad none of their titles are games that I play nor want to :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you. Thank you so much.
Xbox is one of the most consumer-friendly AAA studios, Activision-Blizzard is the polar opposite.
This could bring a lot more pressure on the workplace harassment issue, and hopefully will be rectified quickly, and also on theier anti-consumer practises like lootboxes and too much MTX.
And maybe, hopefully, we'll get some genuinely good Call Of Duty titles that aren't published yearly. But my god 68 BILLION dollars? HOw much did they buy Zenimax for? 7? And that would probably be a way better investment. But still, great move.
Comment has been collapsed.
To each their own, but I don't see how this is even remotely a good thing. I'm deeply concerned about the future where 2-3 companies can buy and own anything they set their sights on. This is horrible to me
Comment has been collapsed.
I suppose I didn't think that through, that is a valid point. I'm not hoping for a Disney-type "I own all my competitors" kind of thing, but Activision-Blizzard is an immoral company and Bethesda is good but needs some tweaking. Unfortunately they won't change their practises until someone keeps a tight leash on them, and I'm hoping that's what Microsoft does to them.
Comment has been collapsed.
Xbox is one of the most consumer-friendly AAA studios
For the moment. As soon as positions switch so will their stance and they might push console exclusivity again. I'm reminded of when they tried to push always online DRM on Xbox One. And how Games for Windows Live was abandoned (I bought Age of Empires III there, now I don't have access to it anymore).
Comment has been collapsed.
Well what company hasn't made mistakes (not to defend Microsoft of course) but Windows Live was replaced when they saw how well Steam was doing and how much easier and more profitable having their games on there was. As for console exclusivity - yes it might happen but i think maybe rather than say have to buy an x-box to play their games if they want the bigger £££ then doing a Sega and selling their games every place such as Playstation and Switch as well as continue to support game pass and Steam and more on PC and table/mobile will be happening - could maybe of course do what Epic does and do timed exclusive (i'm not sure of the value in this)
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
a new pitfall would be great though (i know your joking) but it would
Comment has been collapsed.
queue the incoming articles from every games website asking if call of duty is going to be exclusive going forward. i suspect that this is where microsoft makes a huge gamepass marketing push to the mainstream. call of dutys included on gamepass, or you pay 70 dollars on playstation. theyll convert a lot of people without pissing them off and still rake in tons of money from the microtransactions (and warzone is f2p anyway)
Comment has been collapsed.
i can see that happening but also could see Microsoft maybe on the games side not making/producing consoles and just making and bring games out which are sold on pc (Steam/Epic/GOG ETC....) mobile phones and tablet and on console though Playstation and Nintendo like Sega have done for years now and done very well
Comment has been collapsed.
A lot of people are speculating he's only staying on for the transitioning period, then kick him to the curb once Phil Spencer officially becomes CEO. Really hope that's true.
Comment has been collapsed.
oh i didn't realise Blizzard and king were included so they get Candy Crush on mobile which is nice and maybe Overwatch or world of war craft might come to Steam?
Comment has been collapsed.
maybe but of course those were co -owned with other companies like maybe Hasbro? but we can hope
Comment has been collapsed.
Activision's license deal with Hasbro ended in 2018 so unless they strike up a new license agreement those titles wouldn't be brought back under Activision.
I really want Transformers Devastation, so I do hope to see that as well as War for Cybertron and Fall of Cybertron back on Steam.
Comment has been collapsed.
had to look up what games they have. good IP turned into casino games
MS is hoarding serious game Devs, and i have no faith on them
at least this kill the battle.net
Comment has been collapsed.
I hope that first desicion MS will make is they will kill this f**king Battle.net
Comment has been collapsed.
Activision / Blizzard have been crap for a rather long time, whereas Microsoft has always been one of the least awful and most consistent companies in almost everything they do (they aren't great, but they aren't terrible, unlike EA, Bethesda, Ubisoft, Squenix, literally 90% of AAA developers, etc).
That said, consolidation only hurts markets in the long run, and I fear this trend will just result in more anti-consumer trends like microtransactions. Maybe it will be good today, maybe it won't be bad tomorrow, but give it 5 years and people will probably be pointing at this as the death knell of some age of gaming that hasn't been named yet.
Comment has been collapsed.
Not going to happen, this collides with the Game Pass business model. Aside from that WoW was such a non-factor that I doubt Microsoft even cares what will happen with this game. This deal was about mobile and CoD, maybe Overwatch 2 if MS saw potential in the sequel or the IP.
Comment has been collapsed.
177 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by Carenard
896 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by InSpec
133 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by eifelkenny
461 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by duville
245 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by xxxka
47,129 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by MeguminShiro
195 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Nirdews
169 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by nubux
125 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Zarshir
93 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by rUUk
109 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by Apenas1Catolico
0 Comments - Created 16 minutes ago by Lugum
188 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by Gawrazan
34 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Lugum
Source
Microsofts press release
Microsoft announced Tuesday it will buy video game giant Activision Blizzard in a $68.7 billion all-cash deal.
Shares of Activision soared about 37% in pre-market trading before being halted after the Wall Street Journal first reported the deal.
Microsoft shares fell more than 2% following the announcement
Activision, which is known for popular games such as Call of Duty and Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater, has been mired in controversy for the last several months following reports of sexual misconduct and harassment among the company’s executives. On Monday, Activision said it fired dozens of executives after an investigation.
Under the deal, Activision CEO Bobby Kotick, who has faced calls to resign over the cultural problems within his company, will remain CEO and report to Microsoft’s Xbox boss Phil Spencer.
Microsoft has gotten more aggressive with gaming over the past several years. It bought “Minecraft” maker Mojang for $2.5 billion in 2014. And last year, Microsoft completed a $7.5 billion acquisition of game maker Bethesda.
The deal also plays into a long-term vision for Microsoft as it competes with Meta (formerly Facebook) to build technologies to create a virtual world called the metaverse. In fact, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella was the first Big Tech CEO to publicly acknowledge the value of the metaverse, months before Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Today, virtual worlds are dominated by gaming, but the hope is they expand to cater to other demographics and replace a lot of traditional social networking activity online.
Comment has been collapsed.