100 games per page. So at page 2 you have games from ranks 101 to 200.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't care for or about this statistics, but I think that your idea is a decent one and I agree.
Comment has been collapsed.
6 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Smushies
6 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Sh4dowKill
28 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Mitsukuni
41 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by windenchanter
1,504 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by eeev
74 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by AmanoTC
2,207 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by eeev
76 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Romaki96
62 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by rurnhani
36 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by Carenard
68 Comments - Last post 52 minutes ago by Mikurden
25 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Prosac
21 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Skwerm
154 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Skwerm
As for now, if there are several games holding the same rank R, the next game will have rank R+1. For instance, three games hold rank 81, and the next game has rank 82. This system has an issue if many games have the same rank. You would think that a game with rank 245 is in top250 of most wanted games, however in fact it is only in top2000 at best. I suggest skipping ranks, which are occupied. So, for the example above three games have real ranks 81, 82, 83 but you display 81 for all three and it is fine because there is no good way to order them. But rank next games according to their real rank, which would be 84, not 82. I think this is a really small change, which adds value to the community wishlist.
Comment has been collapsed.