100 games per page. So at page 2 you have games from ranks 101 to 200.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't care for or about this statistics, but I think that your idea is a decent one and I agree.
Comment has been collapsed.
6 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Chris76de
50 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by Foxhack
26 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by coleypollockfilet
335 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by SebastianCrenshaw
165 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Koalala
8 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by adam1224
16,480 Comments - Last post 18 hours ago by Kenruyoh
8 Comments - Last post 17 seconds ago by Oppenh4imer
17,200 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by MjrPITA
7 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by Chris76de
157 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by mourinhos86
8,338 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by insideAfireball
177 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by tym88
514 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Kouseyz
As for now, if there are several games holding the same rank R, the next game will have rank R+1. For instance, three games hold rank 81, and the next game has rank 82. This system has an issue if many games have the same rank. You would think that a game with rank 245 is in top250 of most wanted games, however in fact it is only in top2000 at best. I suggest skipping ranks, which are occupied. So, for the example above three games have real ranks 81, 82, 83 but you display 81 for all three and it is fine because there is no good way to order them. But rank next games according to their real rank, which would be 84, not 82. I think this is a really small change, which adds value to the community wishlist.
Comment has been collapsed.