You should play all,first,to understand Desmond story,and second,in revelation you will play again as Altair,so is kinda important not to miss the chronological event.
Comment has been collapsed.
I bought 1+2 and instantly regretted it, the only thing you need to know from 2 is where Ezio came from
Comment has been collapsed.
Some will argue the 1st is the best(me) and some will say it's terrible.
The 1st one also gives the most back story on Desmond really...
P.S. The AC series sucks. I've played them all. All missed potential.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think AC 1 in particular is way too repetitive. I honestly got sick of doing the same thing over and over. AC 2 at least created some interesting characters and showed a story from start to finish. Brotherhood added some terrible features like that ridiculous "recruit and train your own assassins". It was poorly executed. Revelations at least moved the story forward significantly and changed the scenery. Then again it did add that god awful wave based siege and defend mini game. The series was hit and miss throughout it's life. Good, but never great.
Comment has been collapsed.
Play AC1 and AC2. ACB/ACR/AC3 is worse than AC2. Still - AC3 Coop-Multiplayer mode is more than awesome(why people always can't make a synchro-kill w/o me)
Comment has been collapsed.
Brotherhood was amazing... Revelations was everything good from Brotherhood maximized waaaaaaaay too much.
However, AC1+2 are very very boring/difficult.
Comment has been collapsed.
Having played up till Revelations, I'd say you should play the first one if you really want to be involved in the whole story (which is half of the point of the entire series anyway).
Comment has been collapsed.
It all depends on how much you want to understand the series. If you want to know every detail and understand every reference you have to play all the games including the first one. Knowing every detail helps with understanding the story better or noticing hidden things. The story in the series is multi-layered, some of its layers are not obvious and missed by many. It rewards those who dig deeper while leaving others satisfied still.
I must add that the first game becomes really interesting only closer to the very end, and it is then when you will surely not regret playing it. Also Assassin's Creed II starts exactly where Assassin's Creed I ends. I wouldn't miss it if I were you.
Comment has been collapsed.
As previously said, it can be skipped. But as a AC Veteran :) I would highly recommend playing through it BEFORE any of the other entries, because if you play, say AC2, then go back to AC1, there are a lot of features that weren't in AC1, so it will suck, and of course storywise that would be completely stupid to do.
Comment has been collapsed.
To understand the story you need to play the first 3( AC1,AC:BROTHERHOOD,AC:REVELATIONS) AC3 has nothing to do with the others,just like a stand alone in the series.
Comment has been collapsed.
Show me how AC3 has something to do with the story (not talking about the real life story i'm talking about connors story and not desmonds)
Comment has been collapsed.
In case you forgot:
"My name is Desmond Miles. And this is my story."
[SPOILER WARNING]
Assassin's Creed II
Comment has been collapsed.
Of course you would feel that way, since you have had Ezio for the past three games. But you have to remember a few things.
All AC games are connected and important to each other.
The main story is the real one, the Sequences played are episodes.
The series will continue with games similar to AC:B and AC:R, continuing Connor's story while still being in the 3rd game's range. A trilogy within a trilogy, just like Ezio had with AC 2 then AC:B and AC:R.
You're looking at it the wrong way. Looking at the games as separate and connected to each other. Take a step back and look at the whole story, which is about Desmond going from place to place and experiencing Altair, Ezio and Connor, all in a very short period of time, one after the other. In his timeline, it's all connected, and the stories are inter-weaved properly if you pay enough attention.
Comment has been collapsed.
I recently decided to go thru the entire AC series. Started playing AC1 and enjoyed it for some time, but it got too repetetive. So I decided to simply watch the Endgame-video on youtube before jumping into the other games. AC2, Broterhood, Revelations and AC3 I played from start to finish in a few weeks and thoroughly enjoyed the entire series, with every game having some part that is "my favourite of the series".
Comment has been collapsed.
Blasphemy! u cant miss any game of the AC series, the story is epic.
Comment has been collapsed.
In terms of game mechanichs,the game is fucked up by being simplified from original 1st part till now.
The story is the main,and i stess,MAIN,reason why the AC serial is succesfull right now.
They are in it just for money now with those yearly releases.
Comment has been collapsed.
29 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by adam1224
7 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by xXSAFOXx
16,297 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by SebastianCrenshaw
52 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by adam1224
206 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Joey2741
31 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by Pika8
1,519 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by Tristar
7,976 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by herbesdeprovence
104 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by Axelflox
42 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by Gelweo
726 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by stlpaul
23 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by FateOfOne
12 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Mikalye
43 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Vincer
Mainly this is a question aimed for those who played all of the games, or at least up to revelations. I want to know if I should be bothered with playing the first one for the sake of the story. I've played through half of the game and lost the save so I'd have to start all over again and I want to know if playing it is crucial to understanding the others. I got bored with the first one and I wouldn't mind skipping it, but I don't want to play the second one and not knowing who X or Y guy is because of that.
tl;dr: Is the first assassin's creed skippable or will I not understand the story in the second one if I do?
Comment has been collapsed.