So? Duplicate game I agree with. Quantity of games I don't. Who cares if he owns 110 games on Steam, he doesn't deserve to win a free one then? There are also a bunch of US laws regarding contests and prizes I wonder if the site is properly adhering to or not..
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh, seems like it wasn't clear. I did NOT mean the person shouldnt be able to enter because he owns that many games. I also dont care about the quantity of games a person owns.I was trying to imply that he owns almost every game already, that he entered a giveaway for. Sorry for that.
Comment has been collapsed.
we should do something like this http://www.steamgamesales.com/view-comments.php?id=5444
because too many people enter and win games that they didn't really want and only play for an hour
Comment has been collapsed.
lol? U enter the giveaway for urself. Not for others. TBF only the accounts used for entering should be able to obtain the gifts. No second accounts, no friends, no family. If u don't intend to play the game u shouldn't enter.
If it woulda been upto me. Only players with a Steam rating of >5 and a combined value of games >100$ would be able to enter (which is still pretty low considering indie packs and such are priced off at over 90% sometimes). I also would get rid of the e-mail and make them contact the account directly.
Comment has been collapsed.
If this was inspired by Play it Forward, the spirit is that if you win a game, you should give back and gift one. Perhaps I'm mistaken and this is not the case (random awards seem to indicate this).
I don't mean it should be one to one, but some kind of ratio should apply
Comment has been collapsed.
Perhaps there could be some kind of ratio, and having a negative ratio (SLIGHTLY) decreases your chance of winning. But it should still be mostly random, as that is the point of this site.
Comment has been collapsed.
it's a site about giveaways, not trading games. U either gift some (spare) game u got, which is an awesome thing to do. Or u don't, which is fine aswell. But don't expect to receive something in return or have some kinda privilege on other giveaways.
Comment has been collapsed.
Why enter for a game that you don't want? I've entered on 5 giveaways, but those 4 games ( 2 were lead and gold giveaways ) I really want, and I think I'd play those games for quite some time.
They should be able to limit you to 2 giveaways ( just throwing the number out there ) for a set limit of time, a day, a week or whatever, and having a giveaway of your own, either replenishes the entries available or just adds up to the unused entries.
Comment has been collapsed.
11 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hoanglinhtran196
35 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Moogal
227 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by PatchmaN
98 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by nhahtdh
33 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by intexus
16,567 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by zosky
532 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by nhahtdh
9,811 Comments - Last post 28 seconds ago by CurryKingWurst
19 Comments - Last post 34 seconds ago by Fluffster
15 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by CurryKingWurst
866 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by SixthBlackWing
15 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by schmoan
1,582 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by oct4vius
131 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by IamtheDoctor
How is the problem of "serial requesters" going to be addressed? Will there be a limit of GA you can enter before creating one yourself? What are the ideas for the future regarding this?
Comment has been collapsed.