-_-

From IGN: Chances are high we'll get more details on this version of Fable as E3 2011 rolls on. This follows Fable III, released last year on Xbox 360 and earlier in 2011 on PC, and it's interesting that it isn't called Fable IV.

12 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

I love the Fable Series, specially the first game.
I feel sad now.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Don't feel sad, be glad. Think of it this way: Star Wars games aren't identical, Batman games aren't identical (not a good example since most of them were bad), WoW is nothing like WC3. This is not a sign of a "series" deteriorating, but rather a sign of a universe expanding.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you. Said what I couldn't find the words for.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Fable 1 was sooo good...

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I know. It's a shame to see the game's great name crash and burn more and more with every new title.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Fable 1 was a Great game

Fable 2 was Good

Fable 3 was OK (when viewed as a stand alone, when compared to its predecessors its horrible)

This is a April fools joke Fable. Right?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

One of the comments on the video described this game attempt well. Its a Kinect based rail shooter.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Then you and the commenter are both fools. It's not a rail shooter. That rumour was blasted the day after it was announced.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm just going by what they showed. The player demoing the game didn't make any movement indicators for the majority of the demo as far as I could tell.

If it is not a rail shooter then what is it supposed to be?

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closest thing I can think of is a first-person shooter. Also, "Peter Molyneux has since elaborated the game's mechanics to the contrary, and during an interview, he stated that a multitude of features, among others the navigation system, were removed from the demo to ensure a fluent demonstration while avoiding yet unpolished ground and bugs. He stated that the game would in fact be even more open and accessible than any previous installation, and likely much bigger."

Take that how you will about it being bigger and more open-world, but the features being there I think were confirmed quite a while back.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I take anything Peter Molyneux says with a grain of salt.

He is known for "exaggerating" about his games, I was on the forums during all of the Fable 1 commotion, boy was that the biggest mess I ever seen on a forum. He said that one was gonna be open world with tons of features that were not even close to being true on the final product, dont get me wrong I loved Fable one but I was sorta disappointed...

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I can't help but laugh at that.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Haha great...

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I got Fable III with promises of it being like "a co-op elder scrolls", but what I got was just a cartoonishly bad game. I tried hard to find something to like about it, but alas...However, I did finish it. I paid for the damn game, I'm gonna choke down all the dogshit they're feeding me.
Oh wait, Wossy was in it, that was cool! But I don't think that redeems it for me.

The kinect Fable looked funny as fuck though. Back during E3 was when I was still freshly pissed off about wasting my money on Fable, so that was a good laugh, hah!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Okay, I like Fable III (yes, yes, feel free to mock me. It's got a lot of flaws, but I like it regardless)... but it's a co-op Elder Scrolls? Whoever told you that should be smacked every time they recommend anything.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think I was told that because it was co-op and also set...in the past...

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

LEGO Harry Potter! It's a co-op Elder Scrolls and it's set in the past!

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Peter almighty makes all his games look a "tiny bit" better on paper. Really, since Black and White pretty much every Lionhead game was hyped, but wasn't "that" good after release. Still great games, tho.

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I never played fabe

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"We could have done melee weapons, but the one thing I hate about melee weapons, and guns as well, is that the human brain is encoded to expect recoil from those things," Molyneux said.

"I wanted people to feel powerful, to feel power, and that's all about you. The thing about magic is there's nothing encoded in your mind about how it should feel. So no guns and no swords. Players can experience the power by shaping balls of plasma (squeezing them down for damage or stretching them to hit several targets) and by throwing them naturally (either fast or slow as you would with a real pitch)."

Source

12 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 12 years ago by Bloodman.