Original uses the GoldSource engine (a heavily changed version of the Quake engine), while the other version uses Source, so has ragdoll physics.
Perhaps you could try the fan remake, Black Mesa. It is a mod for Half-Life 2.
Also, while not related to the question, my favourite version was the PS2 release. I quite liked that one. Gearbox did nice work with the port, even made some things look nicer.
Comment has been collapsed.
23 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by Stakaniy
4 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by Stakaniy
53 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by DeliberateTaco
12 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by DeliberateTaco
56 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by GCTuba
649 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by poemofdevil
1,305 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by SupportForFun
127 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Oppenh4imer
57 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Vini1
79 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Almostn33t
2,089 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hebert2099
2,045 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CrazedJew
136 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Aerctaure
18 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by AUSVVEIS
I snatched Half-Life 2 a while back but haven't got around to playing it yet. Partly because I haven't even played Half-Life - don't even own it - and would prefer to play them in order (or does it not matter at all if you know/played HF before playing HF2?).
What keeps me from buying Half-Life is there being two versions and while the decision should be easy (remaster version over possibly outdated original, right?) my gut and experiences tell me that "upgraded" doesn't always mean better.
So the question to those of you who know both version: Is "Source" really just remastered graphics or did they change anything else and in a way that makes the original still superior?
Thanks in advance! :)
Got my answer: the HF 2 mod "Black Mesa" it will be. Thanks again! (and wow that was fast!)
Comment has been collapsed.