Original uses the GoldSource engine (a heavily changed version of the Quake engine), while the other version uses Source, so has ragdoll physics.
Perhaps you could try the fan remake, Black Mesa. It is a mod for Half-Life 2.
Also, while not related to the question, my favourite version was the PS2 release. I quite liked that one. Gearbox did nice work with the port, even made some things look nicer.
Comment has been collapsed.
3 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Outmind
1,996 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Mhol1071
2,235 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by Lugum
37 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CheeseDealer
1,529 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by shak59
13 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Realtione
24 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Realtione
74 Comments - Last post 25 seconds ago by blankusername
90 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Bum8ara5h
121 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by igel2005
7,793 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by sergoll
11,208 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by BHTrellis188
47 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CheMan39
82 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by shadowshiv
I snatched Half-Life 2 a while back but haven't got around to playing it yet. Partly because I haven't even played Half-Life - don't even own it - and would prefer to play them in order (or does it not matter at all if you know/played HF before playing HF2?).
What keeps me from buying Half-Life is there being two versions and while the decision should be easy (remaster version over possibly outdated original, right?) my gut and experiences tell me that "upgraded" doesn't always mean better.
So the question to those of you who know both version: Is "Source" really just remastered graphics or did they change anything else and in a way that makes the original still superior?
Thanks in advance! :)
Got my answer: the HF 2 mod "Black Mesa" it will be. Thanks again! (and wow that was fast!)
Comment has been collapsed.