Original uses the GoldSource engine (a heavily changed version of the Quake engine), while the other version uses Source, so has ragdoll physics.
Perhaps you could try the fan remake, Black Mesa. It is a mod for Half-Life 2.
Also, while not related to the question, my favourite version was the PS2 release. I quite liked that one. Gearbox did nice work with the port, even made some things look nicer.
Comment has been collapsed.
137 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by Fluffster
57 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by bongwaterbuttchug
82 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Zeri
17,129 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by HustlaOG
452 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Aydaylin
200 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by CelticBatman
1,731 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by mm3n
1,804 Comments - Last post 38 seconds ago by Sakakino
85 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by fasderrally
1 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by BlackbeardXIII
7 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by InsurmountableOdds
18 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by Aoryl
85 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by samwise84
4,199 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by yugimax
I snatched Half-Life 2 a while back but haven't got around to playing it yet. Partly because I haven't even played Half-Life - don't even own it - and would prefer to play them in order (or does it not matter at all if you know/played HF before playing HF2?).
What keeps me from buying Half-Life is there being two versions and while the decision should be easy (remaster version over possibly outdated original, right?) my gut and experiences tell me that "upgraded" doesn't always mean better.
So the question to those of you who know both version: Is "Source" really just remastered graphics or did they change anything else and in a way that makes the original still superior?
Thanks in advance! :)
Got my answer: the HF 2 mod "Black Mesa" it will be. Thanks again! (and wow that was fast!)
Comment has been collapsed.