Original uses the GoldSource engine (a heavily changed version of the Quake engine), while the other version uses Source, so has ragdoll physics.
Perhaps you could try the fan remake, Black Mesa. It is a mod for Half-Life 2.
Also, while not related to the question, my favourite version was the PS2 release. I quite liked that one. Gearbox did nice work with the port, even made some things look nicer.
Comment has been collapsed.
153 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by RhoninMagus
280 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by orono
8 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by TheLimeyDragon
1,247 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by WaxWorm
82 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by GarlicToast
71 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by LighteningOne
145 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by seaman
15 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by AllTracTurbo
775 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by lindax
9,490 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Mileworg
40 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by Alesia
71 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by pizzahut
114 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by ThePonz
26 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Bominus5
I snatched Half-Life 2 a while back but haven't got around to playing it yet. Partly because I haven't even played Half-Life - don't even own it - and would prefer to play them in order (or does it not matter at all if you know/played HF before playing HF2?).
What keeps me from buying Half-Life is there being two versions and while the decision should be easy (remaster version over possibly outdated original, right?) my gut and experiences tell me that "upgraded" doesn't always mean better.
So the question to those of you who know both version: Is "Source" really just remastered graphics or did they change anything else and in a way that makes the original still superior?
Thanks in advance! :)
Got my answer: the HF 2 mod "Black Mesa" it will be. Thanks again! (and wow that was fast!)
Comment has been collapsed.