...........
I think, woman sometimes are more agresive than man, but I'm not sure to this.
Comment has been collapsed.
women are more aggressive, so i wouldnt imagine so
Comment has been collapsed.
No. In my opinion, generally women don't make as great leaders as men, because they're really not made for it. This isn't to say there can't be good female leaders though. Just that women and men are different, and are better than each other at a lot of different things. Men are in general a lot stronger, and more logical, while women can withstand more pain, are a lot more emotionally intelligent and responsible. We're just wired differently. But then again, there's exceptions to every rule. :)
Comment has been collapsed.
a lot of people need to get out of their realities and get into the one most of us are living, reading some comments and seeing how "compassion" "nurturing" "goodness" makes good leaders is pretty much laughable.
I understand if you base your ideologies and ideas from your fantasy worlds, but at least realize what you are doing and stop bringing them into the real one.
Real leaders need balls( i mean courage so you don't take it as sexist), real leaders can be any gender (boils down to education, genes, etc) , real leaders need to have the power to take the blame/responsibility for any other action, real leaders do not seek your approval, real leaders do not have to be "good" (maybe you are looking for the word "just" which is a different case), real leaders lead and others blame them for it and the world will never be peaceful, "peace" is a human concept (even so, we are not able to put it into practice) that is not present in the chaos and entropy of the universe.
Comment has been collapsed.
i agree with everything except the "nowadays, women are still pressured to be feminine, and men are pressured to be masculine" part , which does not make sense because no one is pressuring you more than they did 100 or 1000 years ago when it was even illegal to be gay. There is no pressure, it is the way of natural things, it is the order, what we are pressured into is to accept social constructs that are not natural nor productive for our species.
Comment has been collapsed.
It all boils down to biology/evolution - the most effective, pleasurable "setups" prevail - "exceptions" do not.
Social constructs still contribute to stereotypes and influence behavior/details
but not to the extent, that they change/define ones entire nature/predisposition.
Comment has been collapsed.
Government of any kind is not needed. The more laws there are the more corrupt is the State. Gov is scam.
Comment has been collapsed.
+1 Anarchy. If i wanna go and murder my neighbors I should be able to. Those gubberment fuckers need to mind their own business.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's a really poor understanding of anarchy, I guess you talk from zero knowledge of it.
So, basically you are saying that you, if you lived in an anarchy, you would murder? What's the point? Furthermore, anarchy means no rulers, no leaders... It doesn't mean that is not any organization among the people or that they wouldn't defend theirselves.
Nothing stops you to kill in a system like this and be sure that doing that would have consequences in both anarchy or in a governement like we have (unless you are a member of the royal family, or a very influent person).
Comment has been collapsed.
Wanna see anarchy? Play fallout. If there is not something to stop people from doing evil or put a stop to evil like there is now (laws, police, armies, other nation's armies) People will be evil. People will steal people will kill. And it will go unpunished. Humanity has always worked towards having laws to make us feel safe. Why would we remove that for some dumb reasons.
Comment has been collapsed.
They are already existing anarchies and towns without police (Marinaleda in Spain, for example). You are comparing videogame of a postapocaliptic world with mutants and nuclear radiation with real life... I don't know with what kind of people you hang out or you live with, but I don't know anyone that would like killing people because is fun or because the don't have anything else better to do. From my experience and from what I can see in the world, those who are tempted to do such atrocities are, in most cases, oppressed and in really precarious situations. We live in a world where everyone has the right to live but nobody gives a fuck about those who are alive, you have to have nationality by force and do what they tell you to, whithout having a word. And yeah, you are alive, but try to live without money and you'll see how your basic rights are covered, withou housing, water or food.Nice world when you have money ^^
Comment has been collapsed.
Okay then if we dont use money for the exchange of commodities what would we use? And Im not saying people kill eachother because they think its fun. It could be out of Anger, ect. And the only thing making sure that person doesnt do it is laws. Sure people still murder but there is atleast punishment.
Comment has been collapsed.
And why wouldn't be punishment without laws? Would you or the people on your community let that happen? Defending yourself and your equals is just common sense, you don't need to relegate that responsability on anyone else. And I would dare to say that when is common knowledge that people can defend theirselves and know how to, not only police having monopolized violence, would make people think about doing crazy shit like that more than knowing that your objective is someone that can't or it's unlike to defend himself/herself.
Anyway, we can agree on that in this world, the way people is educated and how their mentalities are, having a total anarchy all of a sudden wouln't be a great idea. It needs to be deeply understood for everyone in order to succeed...
Comment has been collapsed.
No. From what ive seen women tend to be more cuthroat. It may not be as direct as men have it like "hey lets go invade those guys!" It may just be in the form of guerrilla warfare or terrorism.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeish, reading some of these, I'll go with a yes ^^
Comment has been collapsed.
No. The most experienced people would make the best government. (And also an equal amount of people from multiple sides).
A gender doesn't make something better. There are stupid men and women. If there's an educated woman, who has experience and knowledge on how the world works, then great. But the same goes with men.
The reason why I think that there should be equal amount of people from multiple sides is because then you can actually have a political victory thanks to good arguments. In some governents you can have almost half of the parliament filled with one party. The problem comes in that you can't fight a fight alone, if you have about 50 enemies. There's just too many of them to get a decision through, that's against the beliefs of one of the parties.
Comment has been collapsed.
That is not how it works ... a world ruled by "women" would be a world ruled by the dominant sex.
They wouldn't be and known as the women we know - as it would have to start at being primates
... and have that evolution all over again - its outcome unimaginable and theoretical bullshit.
Comment has been collapsed.
+1 flipping the power position of genders is the same story all over again.
Comment has been collapsed.
i voted YES.
and i volunteer to be the new world leader.
i will purge the leeches from the earth, pack them in a rocket and send it to the sun.
to everyone else, 1 free copy of uncrowded (regifting allowed).
Comment has been collapsed.
ALL HAIL MULLINS - The new overlord of our measly planet! The free Uncrowded will be all we need.
Also: I call the Vice President position!
Comment has been collapsed.
YES , it would definitely be more peaceful.
For example: If problems arise between countries, they will just stop talking to each other :P... no wars :D
Also, they will push their development to show off that they are better than the other(s). :D
Win-Win situation...
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't think so. Crime is still rampant and it is usually caused by men so I don't think that would change if women were in charge.
Comment has been collapsed.
Actually they have 25% higher over all crime rate then the usa.
Comment has been collapsed.
As long as one group of people have a real or perceived power over another, there will be tension, which will lead unrest and violence. I don't see how flipping the sides would stop that.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think so, yes. Certainly couldn't be any worse ^^
Comment has been collapsed.
What's your opinion?!
Giveaway protected by sgtools.info :
BF:BC2
Comment has been collapsed.