What's your opinion?!


Giveaway protected by sgtools.info :

BF:BC2


View attached image.
8 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

...........

View Results
Yes
No
Maybe!
I have no idea!
In practice, it is not possible!.

Without a change of system and of values no. Only the most hawkish of women would ever reach the top (i.e Mrs Hillary "we came, we saw, he died" Clinton)

If you incorporated another set of values that are more commonly associated with the feminine gender in the ruling system (nurturing, cooperation, etc) then yes but it would also apply to males.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It won't hurt giving a try :p

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If women ruled the world there would be no wars. Just a bunch of jealous countries not talking to each other.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

well... we are having a VERY BAD experience in brazil in so many ways that I can't even know exactly where to start. all that "peace" comes much more violence, much more corruption, much more overall insatisfaction. our president made LOTS of bad decisions with that peaceful bullshit thoughts and she still lie that we are good and have no crisis (even losing credibility thru foreign enterprises). now we have robery everywhere because population have no guns, only the robbers... and the best of all: policeman can't shoot because they are shooting in "victims of society". so, this peace and love bullshit allowed the evil works flawlessly every single day. this is only one example becaise I can't write a tl;dr of 5 years in a few lines... now, take your own conclusions.
edit: sorry for bad english... no translator assistance on phone to check certain words.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

no

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

highly doubt it, the reaseon why politics are fucked up its because one individual has to whore themselfs to companies, people, ideas, etc, then gets trapped trying to please them.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm curious about something, HA66.

When you asked the question, did you mean what if women were in power since the beginning of civilization ... or did you mean if we just took men out of power and replaced them with women in contemporary world politics? I understood it to mean the former, but it seems like many people are reading it as the latter. :X

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I actually assumed a gradual shift over time, ie, a singular civilization change.
That strikes me as the most intuitive approach for these kind of hypothetical, since you are in fact just establishing a new civilization.
It'd theoretically only take a handful of generations to accomplish, given the right starting populace.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's still an interesting topic to hypothesize about. We'll probably never know (not in our lifetimes, anyway) for the reasons you've given, and there's no way to change the past, so we'll never know how it might have been had matriarchy been predominant throughout the ages.

It really makes me wonder if physical size (testosterone? that pesky Y chromosome? or other factors?) has more to do with "power" than it should, but perhaps that's a completely different topic ...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

did you mean what if women were in power since the beginning of civilization ... or did you mean if we just took men out of power and replaced them with women in contemporary world politics?

To be honest both situations seem unrealistic. Our societies have already civilized so we can not remove the whole male gender from politic and replace them by women. It's not possible! :P

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just think how some woman act on Internet... And in real life. Make conclusions based on that...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How they act in real life and on internet.? just curious

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm talking about these modern day "radical" feminist. Which basically believe that there is no bad tactics, only bad targets and anything done by them is perfectly fine if target is "unperson"... Like white male that doesn't agree with them...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I honestly hate these men vs. women topics. There's absolutely no reason why a world governed by women would be more peaceful. We have far more similarities than differences.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Voilence is part of humanity, sadly. So no, it wouldn't change a damn thing.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If women were in Charge, there would be no wars, just a bunch of countries not talking to each others.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In generally maybe yes...
but not on the specific time on every month, got some exp on that case!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's just a manipulative statement without any sense that is used by feminists as a political agenda or politicians who have nothing to propose to the voters. world is more complex then just men - women and who is better or worse.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

*Modern Feminists

Traditional Feminists and Equalists don't generally make pro-woman/neg-men statements like that. :X

Interestingly, Emma Watson [Hermione Granger from the Harry Potter movies] is a very prominent [Traditional/equal-rights] Feminist, and she makes for a good read, if you're ever curious.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes for Emma

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It would be just the same

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

They would still be politicians, and you can't expect anything good out of that kinda people... if you can actually call those things people.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The puppet masters will still be the same so no.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This is probably the silliest idea ever.

A person being greedy/corrupt has absolutely nothing to do with the gender of that person.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If the world was ruled by women there would only be war every 3-4 days a month.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think yes. However there will be a whole lot of nations not speaking to each other. :-)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm sure it would be equally screwy, embrace the bizzaro world.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nope. People have war, violence, and hatred in their blood. Only a world governed by animals would be peaceful.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

ROFL

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Possibly, but I don't believe it would. As soon as women are regarded as primary sex for governing and other executive positions, it will leech to everything else and we will get where we started. Either way, It is a bad idea and a naive approach to deal in absolutes.

Also http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/11/brains-men-and-women-aren-t-really-different-study-finds

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Fuck no. Women are worse than men.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.