...........
Without a change of system and of values no. Only the most hawkish of women would ever reach the top (i.e Mrs Hillary "we came, we saw, he died" Clinton)
If you incorporated another set of values that are more commonly associated with the feminine gender in the ruling system (nurturing, cooperation, etc) then yes but it would also apply to males.
Comment has been collapsed.
well... we are having a VERY BAD experience in brazil in so many ways that I can't even know exactly where to start. all that "peace" comes much more violence, much more corruption, much more overall insatisfaction. our president made LOTS of bad decisions with that peaceful bullshit thoughts and she still lie that we are good and have no crisis (even losing credibility thru foreign enterprises). now we have robery everywhere because population have no guns, only the robbers... and the best of all: policeman can't shoot because they are shooting in "victims of society". so, this peace and love bullshit allowed the evil works flawlessly every single day. this is only one example becaise I can't write a tl;dr of 5 years in a few lines... now, take your own conclusions.
edit: sorry for bad english... no translator assistance on phone to check certain words.
Comment has been collapsed.
highly doubt it, the reaseon why politics are fucked up its because one individual has to whore themselfs to companies, people, ideas, etc, then gets trapped trying to please them.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm curious about something, HA66.
When you asked the question, did you mean what if women were in power since the beginning of civilization ... or did you mean if we just took men out of power and replaced them with women in contemporary world politics? I understood it to mean the former, but it seems like many people are reading it as the latter. :X
Comment has been collapsed.
I actually assumed a gradual shift over time, ie, a singular civilization change.
That strikes me as the most intuitive approach for these kind of hypothetical, since you are in fact just establishing a new civilization.
It'd theoretically only take a handful of generations to accomplish, given the right starting populace.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's still an interesting topic to hypothesize about. We'll probably never know (not in our lifetimes, anyway) for the reasons you've given, and there's no way to change the past, so we'll never know how it might have been had matriarchy been predominant throughout the ages.
It really makes me wonder if physical size (testosterone? that pesky Y chromosome? or other factors?) has more to do with "power" than it should, but perhaps that's a completely different topic ...
Comment has been collapsed.
did you mean what if women were in power since the beginning of civilization ... or did you mean if we just took men out of power and replaced them with women in contemporary world politics?
To be honest both situations seem unrealistic. Our societies have already civilized so we can not remove the whole male gender from politic and replace them by women. It's not possible! :P
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm talking about these modern day "radical" feminist. Which basically believe that there is no bad tactics, only bad targets and anything done by them is perfectly fine if target is "unperson"... Like white male that doesn't agree with them...
Comment has been collapsed.
If women were in Charge, there would be no wars, just a bunch of countries not talking to each others.
Comment has been collapsed.
*Modern Feminists
Traditional Feminists and Equalists don't generally make pro-woman/neg-men statements like that. :X
Interestingly, Emma Watson [Hermione Granger from the Harry Potter movies] is a very prominent [Traditional/equal-rights] Feminist, and she makes for a good read, if you're ever curious.
Comment has been collapsed.
This is probably the silliest idea ever.
A person being greedy/corrupt has absolutely nothing to do with the gender of that person.
Comment has been collapsed.
If the world was ruled by women there would only be war every 3-4 days a month.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think yes. However there will be a whole lot of nations not speaking to each other. :-)
Comment has been collapsed.
Nope. People have war, violence, and hatred in their blood. Only a world governed by animals would be peaceful.
Comment has been collapsed.
Possibly, but I don't believe it would. As soon as women are regarded as primary sex for governing and other executive positions, it will leech to everything else and we will get where we started. Either way, It is a bad idea and a naive approach to deal in absolutes.
Also http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/11/brains-men-and-women-aren-t-really-different-study-finds
Comment has been collapsed.
2,060 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
581 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
838 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by nalf2001
37 Comments - Last post 50 minutes ago by FranEldense
254 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by provista
16,428 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by BlazeHaze
8 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Matwyn
36 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by DeliberateTaco
0 Comments - Created 5 minutes ago by Lugum
247 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Sjadim
152 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by PicoMan
47 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by DarkRainX
33 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by mourinhos86
352 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by GeekDoesStuff
What's your opinion?!
Giveaway protected by sgtools.info :
BF:BC2
Comment has been collapsed.