What do you think about my next computer?

Very good I think, but I would put 2-3GB GPU instead of this with 1Gb, because 1GB in future will became old, if didn't yet, but yes practically all games should run on max on this for now. I really don't know what games won't run on Max on this. XD

And how much is the price of this all?

I'm sure with a HD 7870 you could run AAA games in full.

it's all my budget can afford :c (i hope prices drop a little more so i can get a better gpu)

I have this just about same spec it's been doing very well, running all of my games on max settings with 30+ fps so more than playable most games are above 60. So, it is very nice

A tad weak in the GPU department, but if all you're going is "mid" settings which I'll assume means medium, you should be ok, dependng on what framerates you're acceptable with. Try to go with a 7850 at the minimum if you can scrape together extra dough.

I'd replace the 7770, but rather than that it's one of the few good pc builds on the forums.
What's your budget for the graphics card? I'd save up to get at least a 7850.
Edit: Do you plan on overclocking?

Nvm i just looked at it and mexico is a shit place to buy computers

I would like to suggest that you use the website PCPartPicker to make it easier to share PC builds with everyone. It also makes it easier to spot most incompatabilities, but you're on your own when it comes to large video cards blocking neighboring ports.

The build you prepared will perform as you requested. I think the remaining concern is future-proofing your build so you don't have to run at low settings a year from now.

I would first boost your ram, which I would say is the weakest component here. Another 45 USD and you'll get another identical 8gb stick. Getting RAM with lower stock CAS timings is mostly a waste of money for little to no noticeable performance difference unless you're studying benchmark results.

I love your video card choice, due to the balance between price and performance. I share other readers' concern over video RAM. More and more games are coming out that allow higher rez textures that require more video RAM, and this will only become more common as we continue. Video RAM is expensive though, so you'll pay a lot more if you want to keep the same GPU.

If you have another 30-60 USD to spare and you don't want to improve video RAM, I suggest a 7850. Passmark benchmark scores suggest a performance boost of 70% for a 50% price increase.

If you do not intend to use more than one video card in the future, consider getting an Nvidia if there's a sale.

Look at getting a small SSD to put your OS on. Restarting and getting back to desktop in under 10 seconds is awesome.

If you can, get a few SSD for your games that read from the hard drive as you're wandering around. Planetside 2, Skyrim, Saint's Row 3, most MMORPGs, and most open-world games. Games that give an advantage when you finish loading faster are also prime candidates for SSD usage, but this is again mostly MMORPGs. It is a great feeling, never seeing a LOADING screen for longer than it takes to blink. They're also great for running dedicated game servers off of.

Potential price concerns

Going from 24" to 21" monitor is an unnoticeable difference to many people. Heck, you can just sit half an inch closer to the screen to get the same screen-induced suntan. Also note that if you already have a monitor that will be okay for a short time, you can wait for a sale on a monitor of your choice at a later time.

Using two 4gb sticks of RAM instead of a single 8gb might be cheaper, depending on sales at the time. For the best investment though, I would take a single stick of 8gb. Ideally, take two identical 8gb TODAY. A two-stick package is usually meant for dual-channel mode, which will give a performance boost. You might not get that same boost if you buy two packages of single sticks, even if both are the same stick, but this is often safe.

Multiple hard drives of smaller size means you can use a raid array, but the double performance also means double failure rate. Non-raid multidrive means your system is still running while you save up for a drive to replace the failed one. It also makes upgrading storage simpler. Depending on sale prices, multidrive might be cheaper. It is usually cheaper to go single drive.

Radeon and Nvidia devs work closely with different game developers, which results in better performance on one brand's cards when compared with the other brand of the same specs. Look into this for specific games you know you'll be playing a lot of.

If you need a large amount of storage space for videos and archival stuff, consider external drives. Even a USB 2.0 device will provide enough bandwidth to watch a high-bitrate Blue Ray rip with no skipping. For longterm storage, performance is mostly a non-concern.

If you need a large amount of space for files you won't access often and you need the ability to load/transfer large files quickly, consider an external eSATA device. Ready-to-go setups are pricey, but you can get a cheaper eSATA shell and put a normally internal SATA drive inside of that.

I wouldn't put any open-world games like Fallout 3 on a USB drive for performance reasons, but fighting games work fine from a USB drive if you don't mind the load times between matches. Also, don't try watching videos stored on a USB drive if you're also playing games on that drive.

I have most of my games on external drives of varying size and performance. This lets me keep heat lower in my system and I can use a lower wattage PSU, saving money and some more heat. I need more power outlets because of this, but that's why power strips exist.

I actually have the same GPU, it performs quite well for a budget build. If this system is almost purely for gaming then you could drop the i5 and switch it out with an i3 (Performs very well FYI, save $100) and then use that money to get a better GPU.

Get the non-k version of the i5 CPU, unless your really going to overclock and use Sandy Bridge rather than Ivy Bridge (honestly there is no point in overclocking it when it's running all the games smoothly anyways and ivy isn't a good overclocker without heating issues).

Instead use that extra cash to invest in a better Graphics Card, such as the nVidia GTX 580 (older technology but performs like the 680, you might be able to get cheaper), GTX 660Ti (average/good gaming performance), or GTX 680 (highly recommended if you can get for a good price) - with at least 1.5GB memory for today's texture sizes and resolutions.

For memory, just use 8GB of 1600MHz DRR3 RAM (CL7 or CL9). This is optimal levels for gaming performance, the 3rd Generation motherboard will take care of the rest, direct access between cpu and memory. Slower memory will tend to bottleneck, however faster memory just costs a lot more and won't even show a 1% performance gain towards gaming.

Also, consider a small SSD (Solid State Drive) to use as cache on top of your Hard Drive, if affordable.

Nothing ...

Get an Nvidia GPU. A 560ti will handle anything, but will occasionally hiccup on the most demanding games. I OC my computer, so I can use max settings on the non-A titles that actually push the system.

I have the same graphics with i7 and 4 rg ram. For example I´m playing Arkham City with all settings maxed but without anti-aliasing, runs 45-55 fps.

3570k - p8z77-v pro - 16 Gb - GTX680

You should wait for Haswell to come out in a couple months. It will be a huge improvement over that i5. The added cost will be worth it this cycle.

Get the cheapest DDR3 RAM and use the savings to upgrade to a HD 7850 which is one of the best bang for your buck gpus

What do I think about your next computer build? I think your GPU is a serious bottleneck.

thx for you feedback people