thx

To be quiet honest a lot of games have done this in one way or another. How many new games are redresses of old games with new levels without any real improvements to the content to merit the new game price? This game was horrible from what i saw. It

NO━━━━（ﾟ∀ﾟ）━━━━!!!!

thx

ty

thx

thanks a lot

ty

Thanks

It most certainly was a sneaky way to make more money of it.Since they pulled it off...why not? :\

Thank you

Thank you!

Yea, it's a sneaky marketing trick.

Considering how lots of people seems to be buying based on the Metacritic score (rather than using Metacritic as a way to quickly access all content for a given game and make their own opinion), it seems only natural.
In the ideal world developers release perfectly polished and finished games. As it is, a major update can change a game completely, so a fresh start makes sense.
People who do their research will find out anyway, the others will see reviews and score based on the game as it is at that particular moment, which is what they want.

Maybe a fair solution would be having a single Metacritic page that prompts you with the latest version, while older versions are still accessible with a click. This would allow for reviewers to make incremental updates as well and for people to spot trends and see how much support a game is receiving.

Personally I fear it's just a way to reach that 85 score everybody is so obsessed with.

thanks-if the people who bought the game before the update get the new version for free,I am fine with that.

Thanks!

Thanks!

thx

Thanks! :)

thx

Thanks

It doesn't have a new metacritic page, just a renamed one. One of the critic reviews starts with "Orion: Dino Beatdown is a disaster."

Tanks.

ty

Thanks (:

Thank You!