You may want to consider that you are using a global int, making the program not thread safe. Consider using something like AtomicInteger or the equivalent in your chose language. One programmer to another :)
oh man.. this started as pseudocode.. now I fear that someone will comment that I can optimize memory accesses or somethiing similar 😆
anyway, let's say that this page is the scope of the program 😉
I've also changed the declaration of that variable binding to its scope.. is it better?
and of course I was hoping to get these kind of comments about how to improve that joke of a program.. I would have done the sameif I were good enough at it, of course
Should be good though this.the_cart_number is not referenced anywhere, so I can pass in any int to either function and get an arbitrary cart number. Also, the functions don't have any validations on negative or null cart numbers, assuming you can pass any cart number.
Level chosen via random.org
Comment has been collapsed.
function getNextCart() {
return "https://www.steamgifts.com/giveaway/PbyNT/among-us";
}
function getSkipCart() {
return "https://www.steamgifts.com/giveaway/5IOn5/revita";
}
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks, added 😊 sorry for the late update, I was sleeping
Comment has been collapsed.
Np, dont sweat it :)
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 1 year ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
sì sì, bravo bravo. ignorami. e vedrai
Comment has been collapsed.
e nooo! stavo dormendo 😇
Comment has been collapsed.
which is THE cart number, please
Comment has been collapsed.
ma c'è solo un numero nella descrizione 🤣
Comment has been collapsed.
è il
P R I N C I P I O
lolllll
Comment has been collapsed.
va meglio così? 😁
Comment has been collapsed.
sì
Comment has been collapsed.
Careful, you probably need “return --cart;” and return ++cart;” ;-)
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Also, before the functions the links were like
I liked that the operators "pointed" towards the previous and the next, but then I liked the concept of a mini program more.
Comment has been collapsed.
ma mo pure il back e il next non vanno più bbbbene??? MA il problema D O V E E'''''''''''''''''''''''''
Comment has been collapsed.
1 quarto d'ora SOLO per trovare il numero della c a r t
Comment has been collapsed.
In realtà all'inizio c'erano.. ma la descrizione ha subito un sacco di modifiche e alla fine è diventata così
Comment has been collapsed.
<--- here's a steve buscemi picture for ya
Comment has been collapsed.
😆
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you! 😆👍
Comment has been collapsed.
edited
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 5 months ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
No it hasnt.
That link takes you back to this giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 5 months ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
Woe!
So it really was broken code 0.o!!!
Other guy just dropped like 10 carts, so this should take a bit to fix...
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 5 months ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
OK, thanks
I'll fix and comment again
Comment has been collapsed.
Sorry, I was sleeping and didn't update the description in a timely manner.
Comment has been collapsed.
that's my bad, my eyes dropped👀
Comment has been collapsed.
You may want to consider that you are using a global int, making the program not thread safe. Consider using something like AtomicInteger or the equivalent in your chose language. One programmer to another :)
Comment has been collapsed.
oh man.. this started as pseudocode.. now I fear that someone will comment that I can optimize memory accesses or somethiing similar 😆
anyway, let's say that this page is the scope of the program 😉
I've also changed the declaration of that variable binding to its scope.. is it better?
and of course I was hoping to get these kind of comments about how to improve that joke of a program.. I would have done the same if I were good enough at it, of course
Comment has been collapsed.
Should be good though this.the_cart_number is not referenced anywhere, so I can pass in any int to either function and get an arbitrary cart number. Also, the functions don't have any validations on negative or null cart numbers, assuming you can pass any cart number.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, I assumed that there were no ill-intentioned users 😜
Comment has been collapsed.
Than Kiou malabagaa.. got it :-)
Used the code, it broke my GPU. This message is written blindly..
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh, sorry, should have kept on improving it.. others were also warning me! 😖
Hope you get to enjoy it, after you fix your GPU! 😆
Comment has been collapsed.