I think i will make myself unpopular, but still i want to put this out:

The amount of Points we get to spend

http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/sites/politics.blogs.foxnews.com/files/Jimmy%20McMillan.JPG

Is too damn high!

I think people should get less points so they really participate in Giveaways they want and not just to win anything.
I get myself sometimes thinking like....do i really need/want this giveaway or is it just to spend my points?
And often, after participating in Giveaways i want points are left...

So what do you think guys.
Sidenote: Please be true to yourself and give your opinion.

11 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

300 points are fine.

/thread

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i think if they capped points at 200 and we got half or quarter of the points we usually get,that would make things right, although it would be a bit too drastical

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

point cap doesn't really do anything if the user goes to this site often.
point regen is only a problem during bundle time

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

less points to spend
*fewer points to spend

My work here is done.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I, for one, find poor grammar heily annoying.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

-1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1 to your -1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

±0

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It may be something new to you but here post ppl from all over the world. When you learn 2 foreign languages perfectly you can get as publicly annoyed as you want.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

if you want, lets talk in my native languages.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wanna bet I'd understand more than you think? ;)

In any case, while I didn't think everyone would get the joke, I didn't think it would clause any anger.
I do, however, realise some people would nazi them as punny, or not think heily of them, so I won't go any fuhrer than this.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The odds wouldn't get drastically better considering the the size of the userbase.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I actually think it's too low. The "fear" of hitting the cap makes you use points so that they don't go "wasted" when you sit on the cap.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't really mind the 300 point cap, or the rate at which points are generated.

However, I'd like to see the option to enter multiple times for a giveaway. For example when there's a 50 point giveaway for a game you really want, you could spend 300 points on it and get 6 entries. That way people can spend more on the games they want the most, reducing the chance that people just spread their points around because there isn't enough they really want to play.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1 it's a nice idea, though it has already been suggested before. And as we all can see, such a feature has not been implemented yet. Maybe we'll see it in the future, who knows.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think things are fine the way they are, but if the multiple entries per giveaway were to get implemented i would say that there should be a penalty of a sort, maybe double points for every additional entry.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thx for 300 chances for Fortix. ;)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This is a good idea. Still popular giveaways will be nearly as hard to win.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'd like that, it could be up to the giveaway creator to set a limit on how many times a single person could enter.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I suggested in a previous thread that points be given out only based on public giveaways that the user doesn't enter, in order to further encourage people to only enter giveaways they actually gives a true damn about. Problem being that this would require a lot of studying the stats and playing with the math in order to balance right. Of course, what the balance should be is completely arbitrary, even in the current system. :/

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

interesting suggestion

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

interesting suggestion

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It depends on the situation. Sometimes I'm having a hard time getting rid of all my points, when other times there is an influx of very good giveaways and I don't have enough points to enter all of them, so I'll have to allocate my points more carefully. Since the point generation is 5% of the point value of every giveaway, it allows us to only enter 1/20 of the giveaways created. I think that is just enough. And besides, nobody is forcing you to spend all your points, you can just let them cap if you don't care.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This. Like when there's a bundle that has one game I want and a lot of giveaways are made, 300 points isn't enough to enter all those giveaways. Most of the time I'm floating between 180 and 270 or so because the games I want aren't commonly given away unless a bundle pops up with one.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You are propably right...i am more or less new and havent faced the difference yet

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hmm... people who have a lot of bundle games and stuff might only be able to enter 1/20 of the giveaways anyway. But I've gotten lazy and haven't hit 0 points in weeks.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not this thread again.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Oh.. yes, this thread again!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yep, there are just certain types of threads that refuse to die out. :I

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As someone here said already - depends on day/period of time. Sometimes, when there are many giveaways of the game I really want, I want to join them all in order to have better chances of winning. Unfortunately I can't because of lack of the points. Also, if I know correctly, points rate has been decreased once, hasn't it?
Summing up - I would be really sad if the rate of points changed.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Assuming point gain is cut to a tenth of its current amount:

1/1000+1/1000+1/1000+1/1000+1/1000+1/1000+1/1000+1/1000+1/1000+1/1000=10/1000=1/100

1/100 = 1/100

This does not improve any chances for you to win that game you really want.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

my RENT.... IS TOO DAMN HIGH!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How many threads must we have to eventually make people stfu about it?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Dude, why you necrobump? You are the one reviving this conversation.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because I was too blind to realize the post date when I saw it on the front page today.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by r4nd0mguy.