I recommend you get i5-3570K or i7-3770K, + Nvidia geforce GTX 670 2GB or Radeon HD 7970 3GB< more recommended ( price is same aprox), very good thing. Nvidia is best for gaming, AMD is good too, ( here is these case I suggested you, AMD is better but only because have 1Gb more than Nvidia, but if you compare an AMD to Nvidia with same memory, Nvidia will win), compare if you like: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/GPU12/372,
Note: The latest Nvidia GEFORCE GTX 690 is a monster!!!!! compare it too any GPU, even to best AMD GPU, GTX 690 will brutally defeat it in games, but cost around 1000$ xD
Comment has been collapsed.
i7 has better performance. And it's made for gaming
and i prefer Nvidia than Amd
Comment has been collapsed.
Because Ghz and cores doesn't make it a better CPU, its more about architecture, when will people learn.
Comment has been collapsed.
I honestly depends on how much you are willing to spend and how "future proof" you want the system to be.
For a more lasting cpu/gpu i would go Intel/Nvidia in my experience they generate much less heat and last much longer.
For choosing what cpu you buy make sure the motherboard you get supports the cpu socket. An I5 or I3 would in all reality be enough for
alot of games that people play today. As for gfx card i would go with a 660 or better.
ATI/AMD hardware i have less experence, both the gfx cards shit out within a couple of years and the cpu i had overheated like a mother F*** with upgraded thermal paste and cooler fan, ZERO OVERCLOCKING...**
But some tips for picking out hardware:
Comment has been collapsed.
For gaming, Intel processors far outshine AMD FX processors. Because games nearly never use more than 4 cores, the FX series (which is actually only 4 cores with hyperthreading enabled) cannot incorporate hyperthreading. Also, the processing prowess of Intel's processors are much better, so even if an FX run at around 4+ Ghz, it's power would still be lacking compared to an i5 with an 3.4ish Ghz. For gaming, i5 is best for performance-price ratio.
As for graphics cards, I would just pick one based on pricing. AMD 7800 series cards improved a lot better after that one driver update, and from a pricing standpoint, are much more competitive. Nvidia's 600 series cards also consume less electricity (around ~450 watts minimum psu), but for some like the 660, the 192-bit may struggle later on. Just browse around sites like Dealnews and find one that is on sale and works for you.
Comment has been collapsed.
375 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by AnonymousBroccoli
289 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Velandur
47,194 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Mhol1071
49 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by OneManArmyStar
187 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by JTC3
19 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by FranEldense
49 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by RileyHisbert
36 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Kappaking
72 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Lakraj1209
377 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by HustlaOG
6,421 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by Oppenh4imer
82 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by s4k1s
130 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by Eindirk
597 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by TomyDrack
Hello.
I am intending to get a new computer in the near future, but I don't have a clear idea of what to buy.
It all resumes to: - Intel vs Amd
For example Amd has a CPU with 8 cores and 4+ Ghz but people still prefer Intel's i7 that has 4 cores(8 virtual) and lower frequency. Why is it like that?
For the video cards, some people recommend having just 1 Nvidia one instead of 2 Ati ones. Is this true?
I want to hear some reasons or opinions from those that had experience with both brands form any of the 2 categories.
Comment has been collapsed.