I don't know, I'm a leecher.. though tbh. isn't that why we all joined this site? To win free games?
I'm a poor college kid with a gaming budget of $5 a month. I legitly can't afford to keep my ratio higher than 1:1.
Once I get an ITT job though, I'll throw up some AAA titles.. Until then.. I'll just stick the occasional bundle leftover and get blacklisted/called a cheapass
(I almost wrote chapass lol)
Comment has been collapsed.
Would be legit if you ran around all winter wearing nothing but yer undies ;D
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, I know that feel, but I have the Civ 5 Gold Edition and I'll just wait for the summer sale, buy the Complete Edition and just give every single piece of extra DLC (+the base game) here. That's the base game + 13 DLCs.
You just gotta find deals like this (I only miss BNW + 2 other DLCs, but buying them individually is costlier than just the complete edition, at least on sale)
Edit: I'm stupid
Comment has been collapsed.
If that is a bundle, then yes. Steam bundles add everything that you don't have on your account, and discard everything else.
The only exceptions are some of Valve's own games, like Portal 2 and HL2. You can get an additional, giftable copy of those games ONCE from a bundle. All additional gets lost forever. There is one exception even from that rule, maybe Portal 2, but I'm not sure on the exact details.
But for all non-Valve games bundle = get what is left, lose the rest. (Still, moat bundles can be a good deal even then. I have lost about a dozen games so far this way, but still had a much better offer than on individual discount prices.)
Comment has been collapsed.
I assume most of this forum thinks I'm a leecher then? :D
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, everybody is blacklisting you right now.
The only reason I won't join the crowd this time is you made a Mount Your Friends GA
XD
Comment has been collapsed.
Ah necro thread, but I'm bored while torrenting some anime, so I'll wait till its done downloading in 20 mins or so and go write my opinion a bit.
Well just like there's genuine innocent stories for some VAC bans, there are also stories behind leeching I guess. After all, we live in a world where people think or judge from what they can see.
Whether people leech 1000 games or give away 1000 games aren't my concern. I don't even pay attention to like 99% things on Internet, anyway. Like what, we're all strangers to each others here? I do have some quite good friends I met accidentally on Steam, though. Heck, I even had someone threw me a copy of GTA 5 on Steam for free. ...no string attached. The world is that weird eh? While I may seem ungrateful writing about it like this, trust me it's not. I'm just too bad at writing what I feel.
So the question how do you judge? I judge based on my mood. While I can be genuinely serious and discuss things with cool head, more often than not I just love trolling around. Bad habit, I guess. It's quite entertaining watching people taking their time to even retaliate my post. My blacklist isn't meant for leechers or rule breakers anyway - it's to keep a list of people I can hit freely.
Lastly, even if you're getting blacklist right and left, most likely it's just by forum goers. Normal SG users don't even bother to post or blacklist people around. That's all I can say.
Comment has been collapsed.
Somebody who creeps (or acts creepy) is a creep not a creeper so somebody who leeches is a leech not a leecher. Sorry but this is driving me nuts.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm afraid this anology doesn't work here. A leech is a parasitic organism who lives from the blood of a host which is pretty much what most people mean when they talk about leeches.
When I played Mass Effect 3 or GTA V with people from all around the world those people who join matches just to sit there idle and reap the rewards in case the rest of the team succeeds without their help were always called leeches. I've never heard the term leecher before I joined SG.
Comment has been collapsed.
My point was why add 2 additional letters and invent a new word (which sounds horrible by the way) if we already have a perfectly fine real word that means the same thing.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well I'm not gonna argue with that but just because something is common doesn't make it correct.
Anyway I like leech better because leecher would distinguish it from leeches.
Comment has been collapsed.
Your way could sound better, but the widespread version is just this what the others told you. It's like the word "frag" that used to be a military slang, but now it's synonymous with "kill".
(By the way, creeper is also a used word. It is even in the official English dictionaries defined as "one who creeps".)
Comment has been collapsed.
And I always thought Frak was the version of Fuck used in the 12 colonies ;)
It is? Ok you got me there. I always thought the term creeper was coined by Minecraft.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's some kind of buzzword people who can afford to virtually exchange games on the site use to feel they are on a higher horse?
To me, it's the kind of people that enter giveaways for the sake of it, doesn't acknowledge the creator even if they win, and they feel entitled to their games. also people exploiting dev/free keys to "cheat" the system. I consider ratios and stuff like that preeety stupid, after all, you are giving away games, aren't you? I'd only care the person enjoys it, doesn't matter the amount of cash they've dropped on the site.
Comment has been collapsed.
As usual everything depends. And as usual without full knowledge you can't make proper judgement. Yet everyone likes to make one regardless of knowing it all. It is human nature I guess, or the upbringing of western society.
In here I'm sure everyone would wish that their game goes to a person that truly enjoys the game. But lets be honest that not all bundle games are that enjoyable or really wanted. So it can easily become another grey area whether the person is a leech or not.
Personally I see the people who circlejerk in small closed private groups as bigger leechers than those who are poor lvl 1 members in SG. Not saying that it is bad though in general. But it doesn't really fit to contributing to the SG community, yet they have access to high levels.
But again it isn't a bad leecher, each to their own how they contribute. Some people just want personal people to gift towards to. Although at that point they are obviously more of a friend than a stranger. And personally I think actual giving means to give everyone, or atleast give a chance for everyone in some way. Some do it by puzzles, but those are favoritized too in a way.
But yeah we talking about personal views, so I gave just few things from mine. Always more to talk about, but ain't nobody got time for dat. :P
Guess the short version is that leeching is gradual and broad in severity. And everyone does it to some degree.
Comment has been collapsed.
i never blacklist people because they can giveaway less.. only people atm i blacklisted are racists or people who discriminate me because of my religion.
so leechers wont get blacklisted. What i think a leecher is?
Comment has been collapsed.
THIS is a leecher.
THIS is an UBER leecher.
Well I don't blacklist people for having a bad ratio, but I do thinks it's not healthy to have won twice than you've sent... if you don't have much money to send gifts then just play and finish the games you win instead of joining everything you can if you won't be able to even send back some bundle games at least. Then again if the person is active in forums and friendly then I don't consider it a horrible leecher for having 300 won and 150 sent you know :]
Comment has been collapsed.
26 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by spodamayn
26 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by harakirixx
308 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by FranckCastle
80 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Asteria94
591 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by th4
13 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Vasharal
69 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by Reidor
32 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by cg
30 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by Skandisk
1,249 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by LinustheBold
198 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Xeradan
48 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Cassol
3,349 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Mhol1071
87 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Vincer
Inspired by http://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/D5CPJ/blacklisting-botsleechers
I've seen tons of definition of "leecher", some of them are hilarious, some are just senseless...
according to you, what is a leecher ?
Let's discuss about the behavior of the random users X and Y.
X gifted 100 and received 150, is X a leecher ?
Y gifted 250 ONLY in private gift-exchange groups and received 200 (he won some public GA too), is Y a leecher ?
X has a script that posts a random thx-comment in every GA he joins, is X a leecher ?
Y sometimes post a random thx-comment, but if Y wins, he always posts a thx, is Y a leecher ?
X gifted 100 and received 200, is X a leecher ?
Y gifted 400 (Y is american\european but has gifted a lot of russian\brazilian non bundled stuff - a lot of IGN free games of the month - whatever; TL-DR Y has spent less money than X to reach 400) and received 300, is Y a leecher ?
X is 14 years old, has 5$/per-month, X gifted 50 and received 200, is X a leecher ?
Y is 30 years old, has a work, Y gifted 200 and received 200, is Y a leecher ?
TL;DR:
How do you judge people you don't know ? I mean, I'm aware that the world is dark and full of jerks but... things are not quite so simple always as black and white.
I have more than 100 users in my blacklist, (anyway most of them are scammers that don't even use SG) but I've never blacklisted someone just because "ZOMG he won 200 and gifted the ship !!!!" I cannot know what's going on in his life, probably he's a jerk, or maybe he can barely afford a PC, I don't see why I should blacklist him, we have levels for that.
I usually blacklist people who break rules or rude guys. Now, my profile will probably be inspected and blacklisted by someone, like I give a shit about that.
So... what is a leecher for you ? do you blacklist them ?
Comment has been collapsed.