Personally the games I won, I find most of them are good and I'm looking forward to playing them its just I don't have enough time nowadays also with dead space 2 I would play it but I want to play dead space 1 which I hope to pick up in the next sale :P
Comment has been collapsed.
Some people have hundreds of games to play, you know. It's called "backlog".
Comment has been collapsed.
I keep a SG Backlog category in Steam to make sure I give those games a fair shot at some point. But as I really only got back into PC gaming a year ago, and now have ~360 games.... yeah it's going to take me a bit to get to some of them.
So, sorry if I haven't played your giveaway yet, but it's on my "to-do" list.
Comment has been collapsed.
Went from a decade-long stretch of PC & console gaming to strictly PC gaming, after the untimely demise of Dreamcast, completely missing out on both Xbox & PS2. But then the ever-increasing upgrade demands on my desktop PC encouraged me to go strictly 360 (and later PS3). So, I'm just now getting back into PC gaming and currently limited to a serviceable laptop while the components of my new gaming rig sit half-assembled in my workspace.
Even though I went years without PC gaming I continued to increase my game collection, so I have MANY older retail discs and digital downloads backlogged. Casual or arcade titles usually receive the most attention due to time and hardware limitations. I only stumbled across Steam's category function last month, but I also created a SG category to ensure any wins get priority.
Comment has been collapsed.
I couldn't if I tried. I'm still downloading a gifted game that I won about a week ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
I wanted to play the game I won, but it turned out I couldn't run it efficiently at all despite meeting the minimum requirements. Hate it when developers mis-list their minimum reqs like that. 5 FPS != minimum requirements for a game where reflexes are a factor. :(
Honestly I wish I could re-gift it so that someone else could use it, since I can't.
Comment has been collapsed.
I rarely play anything right after getting it, but it doesn't mean I never will.
Still, I agree people shouldn't join giveaways for games they know they will never play. Let people who want to play the game a chance to win it.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't think there's much to be done about people not playing what they won. I do think that it would be better to limit more the giveaways people can enter. When the chance to win is 0.1% on average, people who want to win something will enter into giveways for games which are very low on their list. They can because there's no practical limit on the number of giveaways the can enter.
If people could enter fewer giveaways they'd select games they want more and have less reason to select games lower on their list. That doesn't guarantee they'll play the games, but it will at least make some people feel better. :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Wait, people actually follow up and look to see if someones playing the game that they won?
Why? They will play it when they feel like it, I mean hell I have bought games and played them years later....I didn't realized I had to drop everything I am doing to play the game I just won O_o.
This all seems extremely stalker like also.
Comment has been collapsed.
Dude, I buy games, and get games, and sometimes it takes me years to get to it. I have a large list of games I am actively playing, with an even larger list of games in my 'to play' category. 99% of the games I have will get played, but I am in no rush to just try it out and forget about it when I am active with others. I usually wait until nothing I have been playing appeals to me at the moment, and then I either go to my to play cat., or look at games I enjoyed in the past.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you're getting annoyed because people dont play the games they won and you have to stalk them, maybe visit a doctor or cuting the internet for a couple of weeks is the solution.Maybe it is annoying to see people complain about what others do with their games?Yes, they won it they own it, deal with hit.If you dont like it then don't put up stuff for free or make private ga's only for your friends but stop complaining about people you done even know.And also you finish a game in offline mode without having a second of playtime displayed.Think about it.Your whole post is a waste of time.
Comment has been collapsed.
8 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by lostsoul67
1,818 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by SuperT
384 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by NoYeti
26 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by Axelflox
16,302 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by GeoSol
47,108 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by BlazeHaze
8 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by kudomonster
157 Comments - Last post 13 seconds ago by Swordoffury
123 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by cheeki7
869 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Zarddin
16,790 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by RDMCz
76 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Butterkatt
46 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by greddo
1,600 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Masafor
Anybody else get kind of annoyed to see the winners of your giveaway not actually play the game they won? Of all the winners of my 52 giveaways, I think I've seen maybe three people actually play the game.
Would it make more sense to only allow one entry at a time? You would still keep the point system to limit people from just entering every giveaway about to close. I think this would make people choose their entries wisely. There's no way 830 people want to play Fortix and only entered because it cost 1p. Someone might really want to play that game, but chances are it'll never be played by the winner.
Edit: I'm not asking people to finish the game. I'm not even asking for the winner to play more than an hour of the game. I'm just wondering if it bothered anyone that the winners don't even try the game. I'd much rather the game go to someone who really wants to play it instead of someone who adds it to their backlog that's 150 games deep.
And how is it stalking someone when the library page on Steam tells you which of your friends has played the game? When you send a gift through Steam, it automatically adds them to your friends list.
I know you guys can't believe I have the audacity to wonder if the games I bought with real money are going to those that actually want to play them and not pad someones collection.
Comment has been collapsed.