Marvel's Avengers - The Definitive Edition (80% off)

Unless you are bronze or gold there. Price for gold tier members is 6,40€ (-84%).

came to wake you up.

https://store.steampowered.com/news/group/9869/view/3642883289650618248

How do you know so far in advance?
Are other games in the same boat?

You can follow this curator: https://steamcommunity.com/groups/games-at-risk/curation/app/997070/

Humble is offering the price as well (cheaper for choice subs). Only cheaper if you don't have XP Gold as said below. Thanks for the correction WaxWorm :)

With XP Gold (and maybe already with Silver?), it's 6,40€ at GMG, while with Humble Choice it's 6,79€.

I was going to wait until the summer sale. I think thats the last possible time they would drop it more then 80% IF they do

80% off is more than likely the lowest it's going to be on a regular sale without a perk like the ones mentioned on the thread. When it comes to the Marvel IP if you really want the game it's probably a good idea to get it when you can. It is very possible it might not have another sale.

If your pc can't handle it you can try it on geforce now, the free membership is really decent.

Campaign is not bad, but is not perfect. Just on the middle. You can check review on youtube without spoilers.

Still not worth it. 😆

its till 29 when summer sale is, i can advice u for better to grab it now and if bicger dicsount will be = refund, im pretty sure it wont have discount on summer sale since it has already, most of games dont have discounts later.

It is doubtful that the promotion at 85% which started on June 23 would be replaced by a better promotion on June 29.
However, it is not impossible because it is a big Steam sale:

As per Steam Partner documents, it is not possible to run a discount within 30 days of a prior discount, with the exception of Steam-wide seasonal events.
However discounts for seasonal sale events cannot be run within 30 days of releasing a title, within 30 days from when a launch discount ends, or within 30 days of a price increase in any currency.

What is strange is that the current promotion ends on June 29. I guess it will be prolonged. That being said, it is risk-free to purchase the game on Steam now and ask for a refund in case there is a better promotion. No need for a guess.

SPECIAL PROMOTION! Offer ends 29 June

It's only a $2 difference between 85% off and 90% off for this game. With the game being delisted in September it's possible this may be the last sale. Saving $2 vs the possibly not having another sale doesn't really seem worth it especially if you really want the game.

damn. already bought it for 5

3,44€ (3,37€ with an extra 2% off coupon from the current XP pack)

Thanks! Was waiting for the 90% (and even got +1 to that too!)

Finally, patience wins again! :D

Woot!

That's the opposite of what most people say, at least among the reviews and discussion threads I've seen in the past, and among those I have been able to dig up just now.

Most people just didn't like the short, misleading initial campaign (being that it mostly acted as a pre-multiplayer tutorial), the cosmetic monetization, initial bugginess, lack of endgame, and how online multiplayer was handled overall. Everyone liked the next two campaigns, and how cosmetics are handled in the game post-cancellation, and all the other issues have been resolved in some way or another (even if that's just by the fact that online multiplayer will no longer be a concern) (with the exception that MMO-esque repetition of environments is still a consideration, and can be viewed disfavorably by some- eg, those that don't just run the story once and then quit).

So without you providing detail (which is something people should really do on such statements, to begin with, outside of the shallowness of social media), it's hard to interpret your comment as being up-to-date.

Not that I have any direct, hands-on insight into the game myself, this is just to note the problem that arises anytime you argue against popular (or at least, easiest to find, so possibly just the loudest) information without providing a clear explanation or justification. As far as your one detail provided, I've never seen anyone complain about the basic gameplay.

In fact, there's an honest-to-goodness meme out there about "the only people that criticize the combat are the people who haven't played the game; it's literally the only good part about the game" [Example thread]. (That meme-like repetition of concept across various threads aside, the narrative is also generally considered favorably, in contradiction to the claim being made there.) Of course, maybe you meant some other part of the gameplay- for example, how basic combos do take a bit to unlock- but.. again, lack of details.

At the very least, gameplay videos have always looked good for the game. Y'know, if you could ignore early iterations dropping players through floors and the like. :P

Well, as a personal complaint, the fact that you have to buy two copies for any kind of multiplayer [ie, not allowing guest versions or local multiplay] is definitely a detriment, but that's an unfortunate design choice many modern developers are going with.

(Which gets really weird with a game like Diablo 1 or Diablo 3, which DID have local multiplay for console releases.)

TL;DR version: See Channel28's comment, above, for the structure of a useful critique. Or even xarabas's comment, which offers both a <what> and a <why>, and not just a <what>, even if the framing is left somewhat unclear.