(My post was hijacked by haters, so I deleted it.)
Well, if Witcher 2 is anything to go by, then Witcher 3 is probably gonna be a 10FPS crapfest.
I'd rather wait, since if it takes 3 years for a PC to come out that can run this thing, then I might just as well buy the game 3 years from now on a $5 sale, like I did with Witcher 2.
I only wish that devs would create games for PCs that actually exist, rather than PCs they wish would exist. What's the point.
And I do not consider 30FPS as being "good enough". They pull that stuff off on consoles. Even 50FPS isn't good enough; it stutters on 60Hz monitors. If you need a monster PC to run the game at 60FPS, then what about 120FPS for a 120Hz monitor? What about 3D?
Comment has been collapsed.
You can tell me I'm wrong. No problem. This is personal opinion. I view games that don't use the power of today's PCs to deliver high framerates as crappy. 120FPS should be the target, 60FPS should be the minimum. The "next gen PC" (if there's even such a thing) includes a 120Hz or 144Hz monitor, and any game that doesn't try to make good use of it, is ultimately flawed and not a "next gen" title. That is my opinion, and you're entitled to think that I'm wrong.
But don't post comments like "it ran perfectly fine", only to then later reveal "at 30FPS", while in my post I'm talking about stuff like 120FPS and 3D mode. That's just infuriating and indicated you weren't even reading.
Comment has been collapsed.
I though the point was to push the bondaries, to have a game running at 144 fps constant from even an high end pc, you could only do that with outdated graphics and even programing since still today many pc games face the problem of using too much cpu or RAM from AI.
Comment has been collapsed.
13 keys via trading. Any subscription - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20217752. Profit!
Comment has been collapsed.
The day I pre-order anything is the day I'll put on clown shoes and a dress and ride around on a unicycle while calling myself Shirley.
Any game can always turn out to be not worth it. Even if you think it couldn't possibly happen. It's happened. People can always screw up. If they do, you literally end up with nothing to show for it. Worth the risk? Nah.
Don't get me wrong, I love CDPR and I love GOG, and I'll support them by buying my games there if at all possible, but I'm not pre-ordering. Not even for them. If anything, if the game is fantastic, I'll feel even better for supporting them more since I'll be paying more. Or something. :-)
Comment has been collapsed.
If you are talking about the video yesterday during the first Expo at the E3, remember that it was running on a Xbox ONEl
Comment has been collapsed.
2 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Reidor
1,039 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by sensualshakti
0 Comments - Created 10 minutes ago by sensualshakti
16,404 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by KASS
172 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by PARKWONJIN
36 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by GarlicToast
3 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by RowdyOne
28,466 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by MarshallBanana0815
391 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by bajok
231 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Rosefildo
7 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by DeliberateTaco
5 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by coleypollockfilet
77 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by cyan3675
2,108 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by Elder53Moloch
38€ on Steam, 34€ on GOG.
For this price HOW CAN YOU NOT PRE-ORDER IT!?!?
EDIT: they fixed the price on Steam, now it's 43,99€
Comment has been collapsed.