its fanatical userbase. Valve got there first with steam and grabbed their large userbase first before anyone else could. Seriously, that is ALL there is to it, steams users. valve can do as little work as it wants, and its fans will just stay rabidly loyal.
Comment has been collapsed.
sure... everyone would be gladly using Uplay if they where the first distribution service... and of course, everyone loved GFWL when it was alive...
Now, GoG is awesome, sadly not every publisher would agree to their non DRM policy.
I'm totally fine with Origin, btw.
also, every other distributor have an inventory system where you can trade games (or digital items) for others games with others users. right?
Comment has been collapsed.
They have the best customer service in the industry! Duh!
Comment has been collapsed.
Steam has been successful only because the entire community is waiting for HL3. We buy everything to fill up our free time that will be completely dedicated to HL3. Steam knows this so it is why they don't want to release despite HL3 is already developed. #tinfoilhat
Comment has been collapsed.
Another good question is : Why do you assume people automatically hate on anything that isn't steam, just because they use steam? EVERY user-base above a certain size gains amble idiots amongst their ranks. It's far from a steam-only issue.
Then again, hate isn't always unjustified.
Plus we've been over this subject a thousand times over, and we keep on saying the reasons why we each dislike certain platforms... and then we always hear the same people saying "Why all the hate?" as if they totally blanked it out.
Comment has been collapsed.
In the beginning, it was required to use Steam in order to play Counterstrike 1.6, Team Fortress Classic, etc., after won.net shut down. So right off the bat it was extremely popular, albeit shitty.
Comment has been collapsed.
Because they let you redeem serials purchased at other retailers and have developed community functions. No other "drm" (Uplay, Origin, Desura, whatever) has both qualities to the extent Valve's Steam services do.
Comment has been collapsed.
They've been at it for a long time and have learned(and still learning) from their mistakes. They've become the go-to digital game retailer for consumers due to their deep discounts and easy-to-use platform. And it's the go-to DRM for companies because of the massive exposure and pull Valve has on the PC market. But when it comes down to it, Valve just had perfect timing when they pushed the digital gaming market.
Comment has been collapsed.
It came with Counter Strike 1.6, then a year later, BOOM!, Half Life 2, and due to that success third party publishers supported Steam, another thing is Steam summer sales, left 4 dead, allowing mods with their games, community or forums for almost any shit you want, etc.
Comment has been collapsed.
Good sales over a huge selection. The client is free of bloat and is pretty straightforwards. The EULA / terms of services aren't horrendous, and it's provider (Valve) has a good track record and have generally been open and honest with the customer base. It also started up when there were no majorly unified online platforms, and filled the gap nicely.
Nothing is stopping others from stepping up and challenging Steam, but nobody seems to be bothered. There are good sites for sales like GreenManGaming, but that lack the unified nature of Steam's client. There are people trying to get into the online distribution thing like Origin, but they typically come with terms of service or EULAs with rancid sentiments in them, bad pricing, clunky clients, or just a simply poor selection. If Steam had some real competition, it would be a good thing. They could drive one another to excel.
Comment has been collapsed.
The program offers an immense variety of games, automatically updates them so you don't have to mind patches, seamlessly serves up DLC, and offers chat, game invites and free multiplayer servers. It's a fundamentally good platform that has a lot of bugs, but not nearly enough to outweigh its positives. On top of that, its frequent sales attract deal-hunters, and so over time people begin using it as the hub for their games. The result? It doesn't have to compete to become a monopoly because consumers begrudge developers who don't use it. It's a game-home.
Comment has been collapsed.
Because Valve always offers Quality, Good prices an great offers.
Allowing others developers to sell on Steam its great for players, they dont need to have lots of accounts on lots of stores. They even sell games with Origin!!, isn't that cute?.. Origin its not a threat for Steam.
Most of the crappy games on Steam are here because people, asked for them on Greenlitgh.... and lots of them, because they where "free".
And of course, Steam is soooo succesfull because Gaben its God.
Sorry, my english is not very good
Comment has been collapsed.
Promotions, small prices that make people buy the games
A lot of people in steam just buy games because they are cheap, and never play them, so steam makes people buy games they would pay and play, and games that they wouldn't play or pay unless it is in a small price
Comment has been collapsed.
763 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by grimfandango8888
43 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by Qnemes
70 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by orono
12 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by orono
17 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by SeaGoblin
345 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Vasharal
1,041 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by sensualshakti
32 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by Calyxie
414 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by Dragonnx
68 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by seboleq97
535 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by Gellax
1,045 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by Bubles
6,333 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by faelynaris
2,158 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by Vegetallaro
Or rather, what separates Steam from the competition?
Comment has been collapsed.