Something specific, not vague like "fix the contributor system", or jokes like "make me win every giveaway", or "get rid of leechers". Maybe more than anything you want to see giveaway replies on the "Replies" screen, or maybe you just want the background to be orange.

What would you change right now? Feel free to +1 if someone said your thing.

11 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Bumb button for puzzle threads.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

One more.

Give away join limit based on amount of giveaways...

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you mean based on amount of previous giveaways by the entrant, all this would do is encourage large quantities of cheap games.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

a way to give dota 2

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, just no. There is a Market around there on Steam.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'd half the daily points. I've entered only the giveaways that interest me and I've never been even close to running out of points. If people had less points to spend, they'd enter only the giveaways they'd be actually interested in. As a contributor who actually buys games instead of gives excess keys from bundles, I want my games to end up to people who are likely to play them, not to someone who just collects a backlog.

And to those who can't count: having less points wouldn't mean you had less chances to win, because everyone else also had less points. Giveaways would have less people entering.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There isn't a "daily" amount of points. They're tied to number of giveaways created.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There's one thing with group giveaway I don't fully understand. If someone only makes giveaways for certain CLOSED groups, I don't see why can he/she enter public giveaways with high contributor value. I mean, it's really nice of you to giving away those games, but since it only affects people in the group, and the rest of the community never had a chance to win a game from you, maybe you shouldn't enter a public giveaway with, let's say, $800-900 contributor value either. Don't get me wrong, I'm not talking about group giveaways generally, but only about these extreme exceptions. And I know I'm not the right guy to talking about these things here, I just think it's something that should be reconsidered. Private giveaways take this "problem" to a whole new level, since you can't be sure if someone made it to his close friends, or just used it for a puzzle giveaway (which is totally fine, because everyone have a fair chance here to begin with).

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1
I won private giveaways before but IMHO private and group giveaways shouldn't give full contributor value. Group giveaways cv could be multiplied by (group members / steamgifts users ) or something less harsh. Private giveaways could have ratio suitable to number of entries.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I could get on board with this. You have separate contributor values, Public and Private/Group.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Get rid of point system, instead allow everyone enter x% of the current public giveaways, based on value (so the site won't be flooded with Fortix). That would remove whining for points, make "fake" giveaways pointless (pun not intended), and make people with OCD to spend points happy.

So for instance, the if current total value of public giveaways is 100000 USD, and x = 0.3, that would reproduce the current 300 point limit, except the current is for unspent points. When Mike goes havoc and creates 10000 USD of giveaways, everyone gets +30 points, basically allowing everyone to enter one or two out of those. If people enter too much / too few giveaways, then x can be tuned accordingly.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i dont see whats wrong with the point system honestly.

then again, i'm almost always at the 300 points cap :P

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you join someone will come to your house and watches you that you read the faq and asks questions so they know you understand the site.
After this procedure the person is allowed to join SG.

but seriously just raise the worth of account for joining to $250 and after creating an account show them in big letters that if you create a giveaway you need to give the game to the winner also show them how to enter giveaways and a countdown from something like 24 hours after that you can activate your account

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

-1000

People with 250$ accounts will not necessary be better/ smarter users.

You cant force someone to read something.

Also fake giveaways are not a problem since they are the 2% or smthing.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The $100 limit is to prevent people making alternate Steam accounts just to enter in more giveaways. I don't see what raising the limit would do. The people with the fewest games are who could benefit from this site the most!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Maybe your right but i still think the idea is good with the text and activating after a day

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I would like to see more stats. This includes a ranking system where you can see who has entered the most giveaways, most wins etc :)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Make an option to filter out DLC for games I do not have. So no more 'missing base game' giveaways will show up.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

SteamGifts Plus addon :D

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That is a manual way, I am looking for a option that automatically can hide giveaways that I can not enter

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

But your problem is already fixed. If you had ONE change on this site it wouldnt be for something already fixed

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Manual? Well technically yes, 10 seconds of work and then it's automatic. I don't really see the issue? /shrug

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It will probably come later... though it's not SG fault.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

increase point limit or decrease the points you get for giveaways.
Right now everyday I'm at the 300 point limit after I come back from work.

Second decrease contributor value of games which where already once in a deal.

Third auto-disable DLC of a game I doesn't own. And no it doesn't work with the add-on.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1 for the 3rd suggestion

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I would like to have a Private Message system, it would be usefull for many thing and could be used to send keys to winners.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I would like it to show me the sites selling the bundles when steamgifts gets flooded with multiple copies of games.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Change the contribution system. If a game goes on sale for a low price, any giveaway for that game from that point on, only gives you that contributor value for that low price. Previous giveaways are unaffected.

Say a game costs $30 normally, anyone who gives it away here of course gets $30 contri. Now say the game goes on sale for $10. Everyone who makes a giveaway for it from that point on, forever, only gets $10 contri. I'm tired of people mass buying a game on sale just to get a high contri value. I see that as abuse of the system.

I'd love to say when the sale is over put the value of the game back to normal however that will make people just horde their copies until that time, defeating the purpose.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Impractical as there are so many shops selling Steam keys that keeping up with every possible item is next to impossible. Also as pretty much every game has been, or will soon be, in sale, almost all games should have lower value.

I still don't understand why people associate contributor value to the amount of money one has used for gifts. They are not the same and never were intended as such.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

limit the contributor giveaway max. value to enter to $2,000
maybe bring back M2033 with 0,01 value to creator

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That was the maximum value for a long time and was just recently lifted to 5000. I don't see how that matters whether it is 5000 or 2000 as majority of people cannot enter either anyway. High contributor giveaways are meant for selected few. As people keep gifting more, it keeps rising thus allowing those kinds of giveaways to be created.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What's the point of the limit then? Allow any 32 bit-long unsigned integers, and done.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Strictly speaking, the point of contribution requirement is to limit number of entries in a giveaway. One can also wager some larger ideas to be associated with it like encouraging people to give more.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Strictly speaking, the point of contribution requirement is to limit number of entries in a giveaway.

I don't think this is true. The "point" is to thank gifters. It even says on the giveaway "This is a thank you giveaway for contributors. All users that have successfully sent $xxx worth of gifts are eligible to enter. Your contributions to date, $xxx"

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And that is achieved by keeping everyone else out. I agree with you but its technical purpose is to limit number of entries to a select few. I should have used better terms on my previous post. Like any other possible choice (e.g. group, private or special rules), it is a method to restrict who gets to enter. Reasoning behind this can vary from giveaway to giveaway but its purpose remains the same.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I would change rules for bundled games. If you have a gift, then you would get full contrib for your game, because you obviously didn't get it in bundle. If you have a key, then bundle rules are on.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Option to automatically remove other entries for game won.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Close the forums forever.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Then how could you suggest this?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I have red almost every post in this thread and only one question pops into my head: What is wrong with you people? There are ones that want to spy on others profiles, others want to limit the max contributor value, others want better ways to report (to eliminate competition obviously) etc etc. It is all about getting more and more to themselves, almost nothing about giving or the websites overall usability.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Flawless logic yours is.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Give myself a 100% chance to win for a month ?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No +1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ability to sort "view entries" page. Specifically, filtering only the open entries. Searching for that giveaway you entered 4 weeks ago to cancel it since you won another copy, or to cancel it to get precious points back you require right in the next 30 seconds for that game on your wishlist; not very fun.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You can already! On this page in the upper right, use the drop-down to select All, Open, or Closed

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wait.. how did I not see that? I checked that page many times :)
thanks!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think there are some options that SG could take from Playblink and Gala.

For example, achievement system is better on Playblink. On SG there's too few of them. There could be an option to make a giveaway only for people with the 'unlucky' achievment (1k entries and no win), or 'veteran' achievement (more than a year on SG), or sth like that.

From Gala, SG could take those giveaway options like 'Max players' or the latest 'Extra Odds' feature. I think it would be fun, if a user could 'buy' more entries with his/her points. We have 300 points and there should be an option to 'buy 300 tickets for Fortix'.

TL;DR The more options for giveaway creators, the better.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There are groups for those with 1000 entries and more that let u win (S.gifts Cherry) and why can't you make a private giveaway saying those over 1 year are only allowed to enter.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

'Max players' is intresting option but 'Extra Odds' ... the most sh*** thing on Gala.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

YOU MUST FINISH A PUZZLE TO ENTER ALL GIVEAWAYS

DEM PUZZLES

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

HELL NO!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

A filter to avoid all the contributor giveaways.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you can use addon for that..

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The only thing I would like to be added is replies in giveaways

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by bobofatt.