A Moral Question

Not that "depression rape" happens, but they slowly degrade, they slowly get brainwashed sometimes, and sometimes some slip through the cracks and probably flip out. I can't say for sure, but I know the majority kill their self before becoming what people told them they were.
After they've been dehumanized, hate their self, and have been brainwashed, they'll usually kill their self, or as a coping mechanism, kill their inner self and become what they were told to be, a heartless, soulless, child killer.
None of this is to say it's common, it's just that I know these things happen, and I theorize the ending, that it MAY lead to these things. I've never heard of it happening, and most pedophiles seem to say that they couldn't, so it may not even exist.
I just don't want to be absolute. Regardless, it is bad for their psych, and it's wrong.

Yes, and it seems you haven't even thought that maybe pedophiles experience both. I've never, in my entire life, meeting and speaking to hundreds of pedos, and having a solid 10+ friends that are, have they ever said they didn't love kids deeply.
Never have they not been parental, paternal, maternal, etc etc, whatever you want to call it. If I ever have a child, honestly, if I lived near one of my close friends that are, I wouldn't keep them away from my child. Because like I've said before, they don't care only for sex, and they generally care about the kids. I know my child would be safe and happy, and would certainly not be treated bad like many babysitters seem to do to the kids they "care" for. Of course this assumes my child likes being around them as well, if not, it simply won't work, but typically it seems like kids love pedos just as much they love them, maybe it's because they actually care about their opinion and treat them like humans with opinions. Who knows, I do the same to kids and they usually adore me, that is until they prove me wrong, which some do. Usually they don't though, so that's why I can believe them when they say that kids actually enjoy being around them and they describe _ or __ about how things went.
But anyways, back on topic, lastly, in regards to that paragraph, try finding a male in the daycare field or babysitting field. No one wants to leave their child with one because the pedophilia hysteria that is directed at men, even though over 40% of the pedos I've met were women.
Personally I like playing with kids, and get no sexual things out of it, but I know it's not a likely field for me because I was born with a dick.
But in conclusion, yes, there's a difference, but usually when one likes kids sexually, truly, they truly love kids from what I've found.

In regards to the heterosexual comment, well, theoretically, yes, but I've also never met one that didn't adore their time with the kids in their life. All of them just want to be their friend, then sex if it was possible and no harm would result.
Personally I see anyone who agrees with the 7second stuff or doesn't enjoy doing girl-stuff as a degenerate. But I'm more emotional than sexual just as they usually claim, so there's that. Really I'm almost never sexual to anyone or anything. Maybe that's why I don't hate playing with kids while most men do, because they'd rather be working to fuck someone than to just make someone else smile.

Well the greek root states it as "child love," which is what most pedos seem to stand by, "child lovers," and it's actually accurate in your situation even with a sexual component, seeing as "love" in western society is usually associated with sex as well.
I find it quite funny that you go directly to a developmentally stalled person, sure does show your true colors. It also shows you have no real bases for anything you speak other than what you see in articles run by big business that just tries to give people what they want.

How it started it the propaganda and scapegoating that they do to pedos now a days, sort of like they did to gays back in the day.
Regardless, I might as well stop speaking to you seeing as you still haven't got it through your head that child molester =/= pedophile, and because of this, you can not understand that it could have been started by someone, who in the case you misread, raped, set a baby (11mo old) on fire, and evidently murdered it.
(s)He's not a pedophile at all. But it seems like you group them as one.

If people "made rules to be able to live in (a) community peacefully" then why do these rules directly result in more conflict, more suffering, and less peace? Is the system broken? Then why not fix it.
Furthermore, if "punishing them IS fixing things," why do the VAST majority of prisoners not only re-offend, but also go back to prison? Why in places where more minor offenses are legalized that major offenses go down?

Assuming that's how criminals think, and you're correct, obviously you're missing a piece of the puzzle.
Do you know criminals?
I do, I certainly do, from all backgrounds as well, from petty theft, murder, organized crime, rape, to molestation.
Okay, but lets assume you're correct. How is he going to get that job? Before you read any further, out of the ones I listed, think about them. What do you feel to them. Lets take petty theft up first.
Would you trust him with your entry level job, as a businessman, typically involving handling goods or money? Certainly not likely, as he could easily steal, not to mention this could break his parole.
The killer? Well, are you comfortable with him working for you? I mean, if they could murder someone aren't they cold? Could they handle your customers? Would you give them equal grounds to work with you as others, and would your employees be okay with it? Can you trust him?
Now for the organized crime. Are you sure you want them to work for you, having possible "clients" finding him, seeking him out, or him using your business as a selling point? Can you trust him to not exploit you?
And finally for the molestation/rape, the sex offender registry, does your business involvement in alone contact with ANYONE? Might they see children or be around them, even with company? Might their co-workers be comfortable with them alone? Is it keeping in their parole/registry terms? Will people boycott you for hiring a known ____?

My point is, well, would you pick a criminal over a normal fellow? Likely no.
Would you even if they were better qualified? Likely no.
Would you respect them, or think lower of them?

Once again, I know criminals, from all backgrounds, and they're my closest friends. They can't get jobs easily, even the ones with a bad driving record from drinking and driving but with no accidents.
They can't find ANY jobs.
Many are homeless, or "leeches" as a result. Many can't live near or , many can't work at , many can't buy ____ or visit , all of which restricts their life. Then combine the prejudice most have to them, and they're a goner. So what will that do? They'll likely re-offend for one reason or another, depression, money issues, whatever it may be. They'll likely NEED to do a crime to just live, to just get rent, to just buy food. Many shelters won't take them, and cops will arrest them on the street, so they barely can even be homeless.

He may not want to go back to jail, prison, but that doesn't mean he won't. That doesn't mean he will be able to live normally, or even remotely normally. His life is ruined, this especially for sex offenders and people who stole something.
Finally though, if that's why they're punished, so that they don't want to go to jail again, why would you want to go there in the first place? Why make their life hell if they ever do get out? Why discriminate so heavily they can barely survive without re-offending? Because you don't want them near you, do you? Because they're not equals, they're sub-human, they're not safe, they're dehumanized, they're worth less, and they're disgusting.

Now in regards to everything you said in that post other than what I directly responded to, see the above, as well as consider, is it really that possible not to re-offend, be a recidivist, easily, and as you just admitted, regardless, you will have a prejudice to them.
They're done in your mind, even if they aren't a murderer.

Even if they did something, the point still stands, "fuck'em."

While you may not want them to suffer, you're actively doing nothing to prevent it, or stop it, or stand out against it. You don't advocate it, but you don't mind it.
I don't care what happens to someone who tortures, rapes, and kills a little kid either, however, someone who does a little crime, or even a medium level one, I do care.

The least you could do is advocate for fair treatment and no discrimination/abuse to them, but you don't. You don't care, as you said. "Fuck'em."

Just because you don't want to inflict the suffering upon others doesn't mean you're any, or at least much, better than the ones who are. You're watching them doing it, and not having a care of the pain and suffering they go through.
The only way for this to be possible is if you're either a sociopath, or if you dehumanized them.

I don't care about the crime one may have committed within reason, if I was trapped in a room with a criminal, be it a petty thief, a child molester, a (decent) gangster, a drug dealer, someone who beat their girlfriend, or someone who illegally possessed a ____, and a "moral" person, if they lay a hand on the other fella un-warrented, like many would because of the hate they have to the criminal, I would defend them with my life.
If you see someone being hurt for no significant reason, discriminated against, or mistreated, then you should defend them. Even if they did something in the past, you should still treat them as if they didn't until they do something again.

If you wouldn't defend any of the criminals I mentioned, at-least assuming that was all they did and not more on top of that, then go directly to dehumanizing them, being a sociopath, and in my personal opinion, being just as bad as those who get pleasure off handing people, innocent or not, with max sentences, with death sentences, and with extra abuse and mistreatment. You're one in the same in my eyes.