Terrorist attack in Nice, over 60 dead.

And you don't think that's fucked up?

"If those fairytales are behind acts like the one in Nice then yes, they must be condemned and their followers persecuted."

It does seem like Orlando didn't matter to you, right? And no, it was not done because of sexual insecurity. He didn't shout out "SEXUAL INSECURITY" but "ALLAHU ACKBAR."

The man was depressed because of his divorce, has made stealing and stealing with gun some years before.

Oh, now that excuses everything, right?!

Did I say something that wasn't true?

Oh, I forgot, religions have some higher power that makes them impune from being discussed, even if they are just fucking ideologies. Oh, and they have provided the world with so many recipes for peace... like discrimination, killing, oppressive laws which no justification behind "my god says so lol."

OF COURSE. They warm you before bombing the shit out of you! How kind! Like those terrorist children that were playing on the beach! Dangerous terrorist they were!

Does the Israel government also notify about the poison they spray on the terrorist antisemitic palestinian crop?

You can' t just pretend to have peace with the people you are bullying while you are accupying theyr country.

That being said, hamas is a terrorist organization acting the same way as the israel government toward palestine civilians

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-22356306

Oh god, seriously, do you think that all these poor people that live in shelters and public institutions managed within a year or so to "convert our muslims to their violent version of islam"? and how did they do it when they barely see any people other than social workers?

Secondly, France didn't have this amount of attacks before a lot of things. Based on facts there's no causality between refugee crisis and terrorism or there's as much causality as with many other things that have happened since the last years. Should we blame the whole history before 2015 because there was less attacks back then?

When Lukaku scores for Belgium, we don't say that a "Belgian from North African origin" scored. He is simply a Belgian. In western societies a large part of people have a different origin, this is a constant thing in the way nations are constructed. Same goes for Middle East countries or for countries in America as well of course.

Secondly, I don't see how the fact they went to Syria changes the fact that they were born, raised and educated in France or Belgium.

Try not to go there, LostSoul... :(
In a fairly recent filmed jihadist beheading that took place (i believe it was less than a year ago), at least one of the jihadists in the footage was portuguese.

Not portuguese of african descent, not of muslim ethnicity, a portuguese just like me and most people i know, catholic born and raised.

One that instead of choosing to become an agnostic atheist like me, or remaining catholic like some friends/family, etc., etc., simply chose to adhere to a corrupted and perverted version of Islam. Emphasis on corrupted and perverted, yes.

And this is but one of many, many, many examples.

What about Anders Breivik? Should the norwegians throw themselves out of their own country, because well... you know... he was norwegian born and bred? Or just the christian ones, since he was christian? :/

What about the Nazi ideology?
How many germans and non-germans joined that particular bandwagon? Did we persecute every last one of any nation that joined Hitler?
Heck, according to our own history, Portugal itself did nothing against it. Even moreso, our dictator opened our borders to the nazis and helped them to some extent, albeit not as much as Italy or Japan, for instance. Should we have been nuked like Hiroshima and Nagasaki were? Should Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been nuked to begin with, in a devastating outcome that took the lives of countless civilian men, women and children? Did the ends justify the means, just because they weren't our children?

Where do we draw the line?

Also, as i said earlier in this thread:

One would think that people could at the very least consider the simple fact that the world population is roughly 7 billion today and the estimated number of muslims is roughly 1.5 billions. As much as i like to think every terrorist attack is one incident too many, one would think that if they were all terrorists we'd be having A LOT more terrorist attacks.

I get that this hits you closer to home, but do not think for a second that just because this hasn't hit Portugal yet we're not terrified as well (which is sadly just a matter of time till it does hit us directly, in my honest opinion, unless ISIS happens to lose most, if not all of its traction before it comes to that).

And had it hit as close to home as possible, i'd be much angrier at all the misdirection, believe me.

I've said it before, if the western leaders were really that adamant on fighting terror, first order of business should be hitting them in the funding, i.e., making off-shore banking illegal, period. I'm well aware this isn't the cause nor would it solve everything to hit it, but it's a damn powerful catalyst. Not to mention you'd be hitting two birds with one stone, since it's also the way 99% of criminal organizations manage to fly under the radar.

But that's the thing, isn't it? They want to continue to misdirect, leaving us all in panic while they're livin' it large. They don't give a flying f$ck, it's that simple.
Tell me something... when was the last time an actual leader or someone of an actual position of power in the west was hit? It's always us... the masses, the little people, the base of the pyramid, the bottom of the food chain. Only way they're ever gonna care is if it ever hits them.

Seriously, don't take this the wrong way, but at least try not to give in to hatred so easily.