???
Necessary comment by someone who's not big into sports, has no idea what is going on, and feels the strange need to say so
Comment has been collapsed.
It basically goes like this:
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh I think I get it... So the end shoot-out is mainly used in a in a tournament tie game, where one team has to go forward. Because soccer in every other game has the ability to end in a tie with no decisive winner and is recorded as such... right?
Comment has been collapsed.
Exactly that.
Allegedly, the penalty shoot-outs were invented by an Israeli man after the Israeli national football team lost in the 1968 Olympics after a coin flip.
Now for a bit of trivia: two World Cup finals were decided by penalty shoot-outs, and Italy was there both times!
We lost in 1994 against Brazil, and won against France in 2006.
Comment has been collapsed.
To follow your own explanation you didn't win 2006.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Tell that to my grandpa. He would rip you a new one XD
Comment has been collapsed.
Let me see what is the point of this thread , technically you lost , theoretically was a tie ... and what is the point of this thread again :V
Comment has been collapsed.
The point of this thread?
Letting Germans know that while they're the ones who advanced in the tournament, they didn't beat Italy in a way that would be recorded as such.
And bragging rights about Italy still being technically undefeated by Germany in official matches, that's something more worthy than advancing in a tournament...
Comment has been collapsed.
OK ... but how much I disliked that Italy won against France in 06, I really wanted Zidan to win another world cup even if the mach was a tie the cup went to you Italy so ... you can cling to technicalities how much you want but they are still in the cup Italy is not :D
Comment has been collapsed.
Sure, the statistic still says we haven't beaten Italy in a big tornament, BUT that doesn't matter to me one bit... seeing as Germany is through to the semi-final. So we didn't beat you, but we got past you all the same... and in a tournament that IMHO is the only thing that counts.
Let's see who wins if / when we meet in Russia 2018.
Comment has been collapsed.
Nah, I don't have a hedgehog. But yesterday I saw someone else use the Audiosurf avatar I had before AND I thought maybe now non-german speakers get what my nickname means. So I took a pic LostSoulVL posted in one of my GAs and installed it as my avatar.
Comment has been collapsed.
Just like how Portugal haven't won a single game in 90 mins in the whole tournament. You don't need to win matches just roll the dice and let penalties decide who will be champions. Wales vs. Iceland will be one great final.
Comment has been collapsed.
sounds a bit like racism to potatoes, at least they are just patata, however you name them :D
the same way i see the EM, thats are just few teams playing some games.
im also didnt knew that germany won until i saw your post, and im german... ;)
but im totally understand you, hoping for a good match, and get a bitchfight. :o
+whitelisted you
Comment has been collapsed.
Not really, in germany they celebrate that while driving with their cars and pressing the horn permanently like they have a pregnant woman on the backseats and heading to the hospital...
and here living much italians also other nationalitys ofc where i come from, they celebrate on the same way... no different for me between those horn sounds :D
Comment has been collapsed.
So what? Then they maybe didn't "win" by that definition but Germany definitely won in the sense that they got lucky, beat Italy that way, and now are in the semi finale (..because they beat Italy.. by being lucky). I really don't see how that matters...
Also, nice Uni profile pic ^_^
Comment has been collapsed.
Exactly. People take things too seriously these days. It may be a competition, but the main goal is to have fun and enjoy the games after all, isn't it?
Comment has been collapsed.
I know right? I mean the game itself was pretty tense but oh boy, watching the penalties was so nerve-wracking! Simply because it's mostly luck based. I mean, yeah, you can practise that... but can you though?
Comment has been collapsed.
Germany being lucky at penalties LOL , If you want to win the game just don't let them go to the penalties because they always win there
Comment has been collapsed.
I applaud this sort of delusional optimism.
On a more serious note, I hate penalties. I would rather do golden goal OTs for as long as it takes.
Comment has been collapsed.
Did you see how broken some of those players were? Endless extra time would be ridiculous and impractical for some many reasons.
Comment has been collapsed.
It isn't practical, but it's fair. Many critics, including players feel the same. I understand why penalties exist, but it's far from a perfect solution.
Comment has been collapsed.
I suspect they do. Also suspect that were it ever implemented and they played an hours extra time with a three days turnaround to the next match there would be wistful memories of those long-reviled penalty shootouts.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think you misunderstand the situation a bit. It did used to be that way, having only OTs. Penalties were introduced for the exact reason you point out, player fatigue. Not only is it hard for scheduling, but it's a dangerous physical toll on the players. There are still sports that utilize endless OTs and sudden death, such as hockey.
That said, many still recognize that while penalties are a necessary evil, they are a long way from a fair evaluation of skill. There are many examples of teams who arguably had dominant momentum for the entire game are unlucky and lose in PKs. There's nothing wrong with criticizing an imperfect system. It's important to revise, refine, and not shy away from change due to the longevity of a system in place. I'm not arguing against the reason for penalties, I'm simply striving for fair competition.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm willing to be proved wrong but I don't think there was ever endless extra time (non of your Americanisms around football, typlz :P ) to decide games. At least in English cup football it was decided by a coin toss while the game was predominantly amateur and then replays became a thing at some point.
Penalties were essentially a reaction to the sport getting 'bigger' postwar, the impracticality of replays, the shittiness of the random coin toss, problems with policing, congestion, scheduling and frankly people wanting to go home. Much the same reasons they cling on to this day despite no one much enjoying them.
Comment has been collapsed.
(non of your Americanisms around football, typlz :P )
Well that was kind of rude, I didn't choose to be born here. I also get enough ridicule from other Americans for preferring the original football over hand-egg, so it's a stinging slight when you push me off talking about the sport just because of my nationality.
I also don't understand exactly what you're trying to argue. We've discussed why they exist, but that wasn't really my original point.
Comment has been collapsed.
And for being insanely touchy too I guess. Suppose we're done then, have a magical day o/
Comment has been collapsed.
Heh, the kneejerk blacklist-- classy.
I won't be returning the favor back to you, as you're free to speak your mind without fear of petty blacklisting from me.
Comment has been collapsed.
You are right, my friend :)
It was said with a winking eye to the [European] stereotypical of the football-ignorant handegg playing American ;)
They [The Americans] have improved dramatically lately related to beer brewing skills and football (soccer) capabilities!!
Comment has been collapsed.
You can't have golden goal for as long as it takes. There's too much money from advertisments to spend them watching some guys running after a ball.
Or it will end like Heidi Game: "The game was notable for its finish, in which Oakland scored two touchdowns in the final minute to win the game 43–32, but was named for a decision by the game's broadcaster, NBC, to break away from its coverage of the game on the east coast to broadcast the television film Heidi, causing many viewers to miss the Raiders' comeback".
Comment has been collapsed.
That was also in 1968 when there were far fewer channels and less funding in television. These days, the overrun is simply picked up on a secondary (usually subscription) channel.
Comment has been collapsed.
No idea how it is for you, but here Public (aka Government) Television is more-or-less required to get National Matches. If they would dare to cut them short, there's be hell to pay. Or at least public riots until Director of Public Television would be exchanged into new one ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
Haha, that sounds like a fun time. That's pretty awesome actually, gotta have the priorities in life!
Here, it's a grab bag of media corporations in open bidding wars to televise any and every live event.
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh, it happens here too. But when it comes to National Events, especially football*, if you win rights to televise it, you practically have to do it in free canal or you'll lose all popularity among people - so if they don't have their own nation-wide free canal, they usually split it with Public Television.
*And with football it is especially funny, because AFAIK for last 25 years at every big event we only played 3 matches: "first match", "all-or-nothing match", "honor match", then going home :P
Comment has been collapsed.
please no more golden goal. it was utter bullshit to lose a match by receiving a golden goal. losing at penalties also sucks, but less than golden goal by orders of magnitude. imho
Comment has been collapsed.
golden goal doesn't grant any chance of answer. you receive it and you're out, and have no time to enmend, not even a couple seconds. you are killed in that very moment, sportwise. penalties are shot one to one, if you score yours, you are still alive, you depend on yourself in each step.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, it could be argued that regulation time and normal OTs are plenty of time for answer goals. I guess my beef with PKs is that they are so different from the standard makeup of what it takes to score a goal and win a game. It feels like an abrupt, jarring change of pace that isn't reflective of what it took to get there.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, it could be argued that regulation time and normal OTs are plenty of time for answer goals.
In other words, 90 minutes of regular time and 2 Extra (not Over) times are enough for a stronger team to come out victorious before a penalty shootout.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
You sports people made your games wrong. You can't have people DRAW during tournaments! How are people supposed to play a game while creating art?!
Comment has been collapsed.
Grasping for semantics is always desperate stuff :P
Comment has been collapsed.
A "Penalty Kick" and "Penalty Shootout" are two different things, Germany won the "Penalty Shootout" not a Penalty Kick" so yes they won the match. :D
Comment has been collapsed.
No because a Penatly Kick is awarded for an infringement within the normal/extra time of the game, a Penalty Shootout is just extra extra time to decide a winner. Years ago they'd play until someone scored which I think was more fun but because of how long the match could go on they introduced the penalty shootout after extra time if there was no clear winner.
Comment has been collapsed.
Don't get in details ... I don't think they care :V
Comment has been collapsed.
"A penalty shoot-out (officially kicks from the penalty mark) is a method of determining the winner of an association football (soccer) match that is drawn after the regulation as well as extra playing time."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_shoot-out_(association_football)
Comment has been collapsed.
But also:
In the calculation of UEFA coefficients, shoot-outs are ignored for club coefficients, but not national team coefficients, where the shoot-out winner gets 20,000 points: more than the shoot-out loser, who gets 10,000 (the same as for a draw) but less than the 30,000 points for winning a match outright. In the FIFA World Rankings, the base value of a win is three points; a win on penalties is two; a draw and a loss on penalties are one; a loss is zero. The more complicated ranking system FIFA used from 1999 to 2006 gave a shoot-out winner the same points as for a normal win and a shoot-out loser the same points as for a draw; goals in the match proper, but not the shoot-out, were factored into the calculation.
Comment has been collapsed.
the match was bad. no team was clearly able to win. i don't remember other match reaching the 9th penalty. ofc Germany scored at the end and was to semis. anyway a much bigger team was unable to win a weak Italy, whose only strengths were the tactical plan and the defense subteam from Juve.
i guess out of Italy it cannot be understood, but we really feel (at least some) like germany was not able to overcome us. a small satisfaction, but still it is there.
Comment has been collapsed.
But if you ride on semantics: the one who advanced in the tournament has to be the winner and the one who is now heading home, being eliminated, has to be the loser. You cannot say "it was a draw where we were eliminated". It's like "i passed the final exam and failed the subject"—an oxymoron.
Comment has been collapsed.
121 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by PapaSmok
23 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by WangKerr
16,470 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by shandyseggs
47,206 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by fomi
21 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by FluffyKittenChan
185 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by vlbastos
194 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by E4R0R
1,234 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by RePlayBe
97 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Jastrzap
1,254 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by ProphetFinagle
44 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by Terion
44 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by Rubezal
58 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by sobbiebox
122 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by sobbiebox
So, the UEFA Euro 2016's quarter final between Italy and Germany was won by Germany... or was it?
Sorry German folks, you might be the ones who advanced to the semi-finals, but you DIDN'T win.
No, this isn't the delusionary vision of a pissed Italian, it's all written in the rules:
http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_14_the_penalty_kick_en_47369.pdf
On page 17, it says:
What that means, is that the penalties shot after the extra time are just a tie-breaker to decide who will advance to the next stage of a knock-out tournament, but the match will be considered a draw for statistical purposes.
Sorry for breaking the mood, but at least we can say that both teams won:
You can at least let us have that little satisfaction, right?
No hidden giveaways, I'll just eagerly await for responses from Germans and Italians (please write in English).
Please don't shoot the messenger, I'm just shedding light over the truth...
Comment has been collapsed.