???
Lol man. This is pathetic. You just lost. No problem really ^^ I was with Italy, wanted them to wwin but that's life!
Comment has been collapsed.
I have a question , how many losses does Germany have in the penalty shoot-out ... hmmm ??
Comment has been collapsed.
Pellè missed some shot on goals which would've been a goal 9 out of 10 times... making your statement completely not true. Italy attacked and didn't capitalize , germany did and it still didn't let them win the match... they went to the penalty shootout which is completely all around luck + player's pressure ....
Comment has been collapsed.
If Germany had not taken initiative they wouldn't have made their goal. Italy was only in the business of shooting on goal out of opportunistic chances, which made the game dreadful to look at. I don't really remember any of the chances Italy created, which could mean something, but since I can't back that up I won't go into it any further. If the stupid hands foul hadn't happened (and yes, I'm blaming Germany for this) I don't think they would've gotten beyond 90 minutes. And if Germany had a different goalkeeper they would've probably lost the shootout. Those are my complete thoughts
Comment has been collapsed.
It's a tactic ofc , it's not like italy didn't make plays on their own because they weren't capable,but because they might have analyzed germany's play and saw that when they went up towards the opponent's goal the opponent would've capitalized more easily... but yeah , i mean italy had the most difficult matches to play in the whole euro tournament.... vs belgium , spain and germany... meanwhile all the other 3 got lucky and managed to get an easy group + easy quarter finals.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, it's a tactic. I just think that tactic is destroying everything that's interesting about football. But I only think it means that Italy thought it was the best chance to win. And indeed, Germany has had a much easier run up to the semis, but I still think they were the better team.
Comment has been collapsed.
After having played against belgium and spain you'd think they couldn't do turnovers and making their best players rest for an extra match , advantage that germany did have since they got the easy part , so italy HAD to use that tactic since they had to play vs france too IF THEY WOULD'VE WON.... overall this euro was one-sided for italy, and will end one-sidedly... just goes to show you how the quarter-final match was the real final and viceversa,the final will 100% suck. I'm positive about that.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'd like to point out, that I'm not really bothered by the loss, actually...
At least I'm now relieved from all the stress...
But rules are rules, and they dictate that the result that will be recorded is that of the extra time, while the shoot-outs were just a mean to determine the semi-finalist (they're considered like another match)...
Comment has been collapsed.
So, Germany didn't beat Italy, but Italy still lost?
Comment has been collapsed.
64 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by BattleChaing
47 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by adam1224
38 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by star4you
47,219 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Wolterhon
197 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by GaTh
33 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by OneManArmyStar
867 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by tinskiwe
9,809 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Silverdeity
112 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by RePlayBe
14 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Gilgamash
37 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by pingu23
6,452 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by Oppenh4imer
8 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by GGrave
59 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by GeekDoesStuff
So, the UEFA Euro 2016's quarter final between Italy and Germany was won by Germany... or was it?
Sorry German folks, you might be the ones who advanced to the semi-finals, but you DIDN'T win.
No, this isn't the delusionary vision of a pissed Italian, it's all written in the rules:
http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_14_the_penalty_kick_en_47369.pdf
On page 17, it says:
What that means, is that the penalties shot after the extra time are just a tie-breaker to decide who will advance to the next stage of a knock-out tournament, but the match will be considered a draw for statistical purposes.
Sorry for breaking the mood, but at least we can say that both teams won:
You can at least let us have that little satisfaction, right?
No hidden giveaways, I'll just eagerly await for responses from Germans and Italians (please write in English).
Please don't shoot the messenger, I'm just shedding light over the truth...
Comment has been collapsed.