So, the UEFA Euro 2016's quarter final between Italy and Germany was won by Germany... or was it?
Sorry German folks, you might be the ones who advanced to the semi-finals, but you DIDN'T win.

No, this isn't the delusionary vision of a pissed Italian, it's all written in the rules:

http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_14_the_penalty_kick_en_47369.pdf

On page 17, it says:

The kicks from the penalty mark are not part of the match

What that means, is that the penalties shot after the extra time are just a tie-breaker to decide who will advance to the next stage of a knock-out tournament, but the match will be considered a draw for statistical purposes.

Sorry for breaking the mood, but at least we can say that both teams won:

  • Germany advanced to the semi-finals, and will probably win the tournament;
  • Italy mantained the clean record of never being defeated by Germany in an official match.

You can at least let us have that little satisfaction, right?

No hidden giveaways, I'll just eagerly await for responses from Germans and Italians (please write in English).

Please don't shoot the messenger, I'm just shedding light over the truth...

8 years ago

Comment has been collapsed.

???

View Results
Potato
Patata
Kartoffel

while technically true, this is the most pathetic response possible

View attached image.
8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Lol man. This is pathetic. You just lost. No problem really ^^ I was with Italy, wanted them to wwin but that's life!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I have a question , how many losses does Germany have in the penalty shoot-out ... hmmm ??

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Germany won because Germany was the only team actually playing football.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, don't ever talk about football again please.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why? Italy was only trying to break the play of Germany instead of creating opportunities themselves. They simply waited for the penalty shootout to begin. That was what happened.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Pellè missed some shot on goals which would've been a goal 9 out of 10 times... making your statement completely not true. Italy attacked and didn't capitalize , germany did and it still didn't let them win the match... they went to the penalty shootout which is completely all around luck + player's pressure ....

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If Germany had not taken initiative they wouldn't have made their goal. Italy was only in the business of shooting on goal out of opportunistic chances, which made the game dreadful to look at. I don't really remember any of the chances Italy created, which could mean something, but since I can't back that up I won't go into it any further. If the stupid hands foul hadn't happened (and yes, I'm blaming Germany for this) I don't think they would've gotten beyond 90 minutes. And if Germany had a different goalkeeper they would've probably lost the shootout. Those are my complete thoughts

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's a tactic ofc , it's not like italy didn't make plays on their own because they weren't capable,but because they might have analyzed germany's play and saw that when they went up towards the opponent's goal the opponent would've capitalized more easily... but yeah , i mean italy had the most difficult matches to play in the whole euro tournament.... vs belgium , spain and germany... meanwhile all the other 3 got lucky and managed to get an easy group + easy quarter finals.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes, it's a tactic. I just think that tactic is destroying everything that's interesting about football. But I only think it means that Italy thought it was the best chance to win. And indeed, Germany has had a much easier run up to the semis, but I still think they were the better team.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

After having played against belgium and spain you'd think they couldn't do turnovers and making their best players rest for an extra match , advantage that germany did have since they got the easy part , so italy HAD to use that tactic since they had to play vs france too IF THEY WOULD'VE WON.... overall this euro was one-sided for italy, and will end one-sidedly... just goes to show you how the quarter-final match was the real final and viceversa,the final will 100% suck. I'm positive about that.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I agree, this was the final. France and Portugal and certainly Wales are not better than either Germany or Italy. Especially Portugal sucks this time.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'd like to point out, that I'm not really bothered by the loss, actually...
At least I'm now relieved from all the stress...
But rules are rules, and they dictate that the result that will be recorded is that of the extra time, while the shoot-outs were just a mean to determine the semi-finalist (they're considered like another match)...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Also, for those who still might not want to believe it, the penalties shot during the regular match ARE considered in the result.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's why it says : Germany - Italy = 1 - 1 (6 - 5) , because the match is a draw... but whatever , the finals will be absolutely one-sided

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

So, Germany didn't beat Italy, but Italy still lost?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Could be worse... like the Falkland War...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 8 years ago by MikuIT.