Would you like to have Blacklist with more than 1.000 users?
Personally, I don't use any of them (black or white) so much. But different people, different necessities.
Comment has been collapsed.
On a separate note, for every giveaway created there has to be a winner and not everyone can actually be on a positive w/g ratio or the site would not work. If you plan on blacklisting people with negative ratios whether its based on CV or games won/given, you will need way more than 10,000 BL spots. May i actually ask why you think games won/ratio is more important than contribution value? Do you think a 1P giveaway has the same value as a 50P giveaway?
If using this site is really not working for you, maybe its time for you to think about using another vehicle for your giveaways which would suit your requirements better. With regards to your question i used to have a blacklist but it never reached beyond 20 and I have now removed everyone on my list. Therefore, having up to 1000 blacklist users would not be useful for me. I find focusing on my blacklist makes me think more about the negative aspects of the site than the positive parts (glass half empty/full thinking).
Comment has been collapsed.
You're too soft!
We need to ban everyone with less sent than won because they are leeches.
Then we also need to ban everyone with more sent than won because they are pretentious bastards with too much money and nobody should strive for imaginary points.
Obviously, also ban everyone with 0-0 as why are they even on the site?
Then just rename the remainder Steamtrades2 and catapult to space, because the remaining people are too pure for Earth.
Comment has been collapsed.
I see other people have tried the stick and that hasn't exactly worked out well. Maybe the carrot might work better but i am not holding out much hope!
Comment has been collapsed.
Don't forget to ban people who don't post in the forums (not participating in the community), people who post things people don't like in discussions (toxic users), people who post things people do like in discussions (just trying to get onto peoples whitelists), low level users (not generous enough), high level users (flaunting their wealth), people who don't play their wins (undeserving), people who do play their wins (obviously cheating, ain't nobody got the time for that), people who give away cheap games (farming CV), people who give away expensive games (elitists), people who don't give away games (goes without saying), people who own lots of games on Steam (they don't need any more), people who don't own lots of games on Steam (clearly alt accounts), people who make group giveaways (secretive CV farms exploiting region locked gifts), people who don't make group giveaways (feeding the bots), and so on and so forth...
Comment has been collapsed.
Hold that thought, I think you might be onto something.
Oh, and don't forget to ban people celebrating cakedays (wasting another year on the site).
Happy Cakeday
Comment has been collapsed.
Hmm... I'm not sure about that. I mean, as far as I'm concerned, the more cats, the better. However, this could potentially lead to a cuteness overload and as everyone knows, cuteness overload's side effects may include nosebleed and head explosion.... and ultimately, we might see a decline in SG's active population.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think that's enough. It doesn't make sense to blacklist people for a game they get for free.
I have no job for 3 years. If I had enough money to buy games, I wouldn't have visited this site or any other site. I spend my time on the games I gift.
People who add me to the blacklist should not participate in the giveaways I prepared. If they do such a thing, those people are hypocritical.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you can't contact a user due to them being blacklisted* or due to them not having any public giveaways you can comment in, note that you can request staff to contact them on your behalf if it relates to SG functions (like the delivery of a gift). Unlike necroing, which inconveniences the community and can lead to irritation and blacklists* , contacting through staff makes use of the site's volunteers in a capcity they're intended for, while also ensuring that your attempts to communicate with your winner have been properly conveyed to staff. In short, it's a much more appreciable approach.
* After the above considerations, I've become curious if you chose this thread because of a blacklist issue between you and the OP, because you had the intention of soliciting blacklists for yourself, or if it was nothing more than an unfortunate choice of topic. :P
Comment has been collapsed.
If you BL more than 1000 users, you need a shrink, not a longer list.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes.
But, let me explain why.
Those 1000 users could probably be filtered out more easily by:
1000 isn't "much", but manual filtering should optimally be the last thing that's needed.
Honestly I've been finding myself using it more then I'd like to lately, because the amount of bot users has been very much on the rise again.
Some years ago SG did a big ban on users who use "autojoiners". But it's been so long since that ban wave, that people have already forgotten about them. So and then if you post a series of giveaways, a few users with autojoiners will also "auto thank" - and make themselves rather obviously known. Honestly it's nice to think the giver if you win, but thanking with a generic message 5x in a second is more than a little sus.
Not sure if such autojoiner ban waves still happen - but i suspect they don't.
Comment has been collapsed.
If your limit is exhausted, it's time to change your "some standards")
Comment has been collapsed.
Sorry for my bad english i'll do my best.
I've only put some guyz on my BL since i've join SG but i found not fair to only try to win games without give some games.
But i dont understand why i got put in some BL i've won 11 games (110$) and give 10 games (210$) and one game on Uplay.
According to SG stats i've won -2 games fewers than i should.
Are you on the same position than me ? blacklisted but with more game given in quantity or price ?
I would try to understand why some person do this.
Comment has been collapsed.
People are weird with varying priorities and what justifies a blacklist for you is probably different for other people. Your blacklists could be a result of a comment on the discussions, or maybe someone felt entitled to a win you got, or maybe even someone accidentally pressed blacklist instead of whitelist. Don't worry about it too much.
Comment has been collapsed.
People are weird. Don't worry about it.
I think because of this comment you will be given a few more BL. I think I can get them too. Guys, don't hesitate - if you need someone you want to add to BL, you can do it with me. I will love you anyway)))
Comment has been collapsed.
Hey no the creator of the thread wants to blacklist more people
But people blacklist for various reasons
Like you win you get blacklisted,You win a game someone else wanted you get blacklisted,you write something with a different opinion you get blacklisted
But you can earn Whitelist the same way.
^-^
Comment has been collapsed.
lol im here since...emmm....7 years?? i cant remember...i have only...about 20 blacklist xDDD and usually because they bl me so ... reach 1000 its a hard work
Comment has been collapsed.
i think. that the blacklist must have verifiable or restricted tickets in order to add a user to the blacklist just like that. because you didn't like his avatar or he won more games than you, it was impossible. It's just not fair. I have not done anything wrong to SG users, however, I am on their blacklists. this is very insulting.
Comment has been collapsed.
156 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by NebraskaJones
395 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by wigglenose
39 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Foxhack
284 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Wok
8 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by TheLimeyDragon
1,247 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by WaxWorm
82 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by GarlicToast
1 Comments - Last post 26 seconds ago by NB264
3 Comments - Last post 35 seconds ago by Filipi
217 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by jm
29 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by AndyyOak
79 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by Ottah
1,372 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by Vasharal
17 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Mitsukuni
Blacklist is limited to 1.000 users only.
As for some users, who have been long here (like me) & who have "some standards" - we have exhausted the list of 1.000 users.
Do some of you think that we should make Blacklist longer than 1.000 users? Vote.
Or is 1.000 users enough? Vote, comment.
Personally, I would even become a Patron, if that would give me an option to have more than 1.000 users on Blacklist.
Otherwise users like me would give only in the "group giveaways", hidden from the rest of the people who don't give pennies (& much less games here).
Comment has been collapsed.