Stealing is bad, but food is essential, it's not like pirating games or something you can live without.
However, if someone thinks that be a fair person is more important than a living person, well so be it...
But life isn,'t fair, you know...
Comment has been collapsed.
It largely depends on whether those I am stealing from has plenty or little. If the person/people I steal from has much, and is just being stingy, then it wouldn't be stealing. Should my family be grateful, I would be giving my family what they rightfully deserved. I wouldn't necessarily admonish those who did the opposite immediately. I would first try to understand the reasons behind their actions. Should the reasons prove sufficient, I would let it go. Should the reasons not prove sufficient (such as because they are afraid), I would admonish them.
Comment has been collapsed.
To answer this question I will go off on a tangent, loop around, toss in a few distractions and then answer it at some point during my ramble. First off let's start with something that isn't a crime, just not really fair to others. There are sometimes free samples in stores where some people take multiple of the same thing. You often see this if the person giving out the free samples has left their counter for a moment. Perhaps to grab another box to replace the one a customer took from their display. The fact the multi-samplers tend to only do this when the display is unguarded means they know what they are doing is wrong, yet they do it anyway. Perhaps it is the thrill of the act of doing something sneaky, perhaps they are just really good samples or perhaps the samples were just too small that they truly did need multiple just to determine if they like the product or not. You often see people at supermarkets helping themselves to a grape or some bulk candy turning these products in to unintended sample bins. Since they are trained by the stores to try samples this might even be done subconsciously. The person doing it may not even consider it theft especially since it is so seldom that you hear of someone being punished for sampling bulk bin items. Perhaps if confronted they may say "I'm just sampling to see if I want to buy it" or "Almost everyone does it, the stores work that in to the cost of the products" or "Buzz off". One of the worst offenders for the candy bin thievery is kids when their mother/father's back is turned. Technically the law states the parents are accountable for the actions of the child, so technically they are just as guilty of their child's theft as the child is. Some may argue the child doesn't know any better, bad parenting or the child is just too innocent to know their action is wrong. Fine lines between intent of actions and reality of actions. So when you think about it, that loaf of bread could be taken by a child, it could be theft however children are often thought to be too innocent to be criminals. It could be someone taking the bread in order to make their own sample of it since in their mind sampling is not a crime. Where is the line between "sample" and "theft"? If you sample 1 or 2 candies, is that okay? What about 3 or 4? Does having a third candy switch it from "sampling" to "theft"? What if they are small candies, can you have an extra small one but only one larger one before it is truly theft? Going back to the bread. If we compare a bun to a small candy and a loaf of bread to a large candy, one could assume we could take a bun or two without it being punishable. If we can take one larger candy as a sample without it being a crime then one could assume a loaf of bread could be considered the same. Unless size truly does matter when it comes to if it is a crime or not. Perhaps cost too. Candies are definitely cheaper for the most part than a loaf of bread, however if you look in the bulk bins some of the candy is pretty expensive. They may be small but they are heavy which easily ramps up the cost of the candy. The loaf is actually pretty light and on some days bread is actually pretty cheap, so it may even be cheaper than the sample of candy was. So if it came down to my family starving or stealing a loaf of bread? I would let my child lick the loaf as a sample. Since I am a health inspector, the store would no longer legally be able to sell that loaf for health and safety concerns and I would take the loaf with be for health and safety reasons.
Comment has been collapsed.
Of course I would steal. I'll even steal without the starving part.
Comment has been collapsed.
Of course I would, and I would steal even more if necessary.
Comment has been collapsed.
I would if I had no other choice - and skip the meal myself so my family could have as much as possible.
On the one hand, I would admire a person for his/her morals if he/she choose the opposite. On the other hand, I would feel a sting of thinking less of that person at the same time for not feeding his/her family.
Comment has been collapsed.
58 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Gamy7
1,230 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by Draconiano
56 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by Mantve
47,113 Comments - Last post 56 minutes ago by Axelflox
16,338 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Peiperissimus
119 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Axelflox
1,866 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by rongey420
8 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Axelflox
134 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by TinaG
26 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by adam1224
54 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by SirMustachio
9,558 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by PossiblePsycho
59 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by Ninglor03
14 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by Noxco
In the most dire of circumstances,
Would you steal a loaf of bread to feed your family? Would you admonish another who chooses to do the opposite?
Either thieve to feed, or starve-- there are no alternatives.
Answer below to be invited here. Giveaway is here. Party with your socks off.
Comment has been collapsed.